From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Galloway To: joel@OARcorp.com, law@cygnus.com Cc: egcs@cygnus.com, gregg@eoeml.gtri.gatech.edu Subject: Re: EGCS-970929 and GNAT-3.10p? Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 09:26:00 -0000 Message-id: <199710091528.LAA07015@nospokes.gtri.gatech.edu> X-SW-Source: 1997-10/msg00348.html On Wed, 8 Oct 1997, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > > > Greg Galloway wrote: > > > > Is it possible to (re)build GNAT-3.10p with EGCS-970929 instead of > > GCC-2.7.2.1? > We don't know. Nobody's actually tried it... Well, maybe one person, > but I don't know what version of GNAT and EGCS he was working with or > how much time he spent on it. > > > The gnat-3.10p-src/gcc-2721.dif seems to contain patches > > that have already been applied to EGCS. > Most, if not all of those patches should be in EGCS. > > However, other changes made since gcc-2.7 may prevent GNAT from building. The first show stopper with egcs+gnat is the routine get_inner_reference() which is defined in gcc/tree.h as taking 8 arguments. It is called from gcc/ada/a-trans.c with only 7 arguments. Thanks for the offer to help, Greg ---- Gregory L. Galloway Research Scientist I http://eoeml.gtri.gatech.edu/home/gregg/