From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: chris@lslsun.epfl.ch (Christian Iseli)
To: amylaar@cygnus.co.uk
Cc: crux@Pool.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE, pcg@goof.com, egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: question regarding asm()
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 02:28:00 -0000
Message-id: <199710291028.LAA24605@lslsun17.epfl.ch>
X-SW-Source: 1997-10/msg01221.html

> You should rather use an extra hard register number for the frame pointer,
> and then eliminate this frame pointer either to the hard frame pointer or
> to the stack.
         ^^^^^
(I guess you mean the stack pointer...)

Hmm...  That's what I'm doing already.  reload, at least with Bernd's
patch applied, puts the HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNO in the bad_spill_regs,
even when frame_pointer_needed is 0.  That's what I patched...

					Christian