From: Jim Wilson <wilson@cygnus.com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@dcc.unicamp.br>
Cc: egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: compile/961203-1.c
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 11:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199710301955.LAA16923@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <or4t5zllz7.fsf@grupiara.dcc.unicamp.br>
Your patch is not correct.
You can't verify whether a size is negative by checking TREE_INT_CST_LOW.
Type sizes are stored as a pair of integers, and are negative only if
TREE_INT_CST_HIGH is negative. Your patch will break 32 bit to 64 bit
cross compilation, because in such a case we need both integers to correctly
handle 64 bit type sizes, and it is easy for TREE_INT_CST_LOW to appear
to be negative when the entire value is not negative. It isn't clear if
your patch will still if you check TREE_INT_CST_HIGH instead; I haven't
tried checking this.
Also, just because TREE_INT_CST_HIGH is negative does not mean that there
is a problem. If you are cross compiling from a 32 bit host to a 64 bit
target, and you have a structure size which is very large, it could be
that TREE_INT_CST_HIGH will appear to be negative. Gcc should not fail
for such a case. Type sizes should be unsigned values, so ones that appear
to be negative should still be OK.
The proper way to handle this is to check whether a type size computation
resulted in an overflow. In that case, and only in that case, gcc should fail.
We did try such a patch. Unfortunately, this patch broke the Fortran front
end and had to be removed. It turns out that the Fortran front end
intentionally generates an array large enough to cause a type size overflow.
We need to find a way to fix this problem, and then we can readd the type
size overflow error patch to fix the compile/961203-1.c problem.
Jim
prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-10-30 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-10-28 22:39 compile/961203-1.c Jeffrey A Law
1997-10-30 0:04 ` compile/961203-1.c Alexandre Oliva
1997-10-30 8:09 ` compile/961203-1.c Jeffrey A Law
1997-10-30 11:56 ` Jim Wilson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=199710301955.LAA16923@cygnus.com \
--to=wilson@cygnus.com \
--cc=egcs@cygnus.com \
--cc=oliva@dcc.unicamp.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).