From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Lipe To: law@cygnus.com Cc: egcs@cygnus.com Subject: Re: is libf2c.a allegedly multilibbed? Date: Sat, 01 Nov 1997 15:16:00 -0000 Message-id: <19971101171553.49056@dgii.com> References: <19971101160613.44879@dgii.com> <11942.878424304@hurl.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 1997-11/msg00015.html > > link errors. All the ELF tests but one (details to follow) link > > and execute OK. > alpha-1? Yes. Now you blew my surpise. I was trying to build suspense for the Grand Test Output which is _still_ running. :-) FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/alpha1.f execution, -O0 Interestingly, with the optimization passes, it passes PASS: g77.f-torture/execute/alpha1.f compilation, -O1 PASS: g77.f-torture/execute/alpha1.f execution, -O1 PASS: g77.f-torture/execute/alpha1.f compilation, -O2 PASS: g77.f-torture/execute/alpha1.f execution, -O2 > > Have I bozoed something in my test fixture, or does libf2c.a really > > only need to be built oncd instead of per multilibbed target? > You've run into a known problem -- the fortran libraries aren't > set up to multilib yet. > > I would expect this to be addressed when we pull the fortran > runtime out to its own toplevel directory. Lovely. Then I will bother anyone with the -mcoff runtest output nor bother with it further. Thanx for heading me off on that one. RJL