From: "Michael P. Hayes" <michaelh@ongaonga.chch.cri.nz>
To: egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Loop optimisation
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 19:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199711050335.QAA19282@ongaonga.chch.cri.nz> (raw)
I've noticed that GCC poorly optimises the following loops:
void foo(const float *src, float *dst, int size, int offset)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < size; i++)
dst[i + offset] = src[i];
}
where the loop RTL of interest after CSE is
(set (reg:SI 43) (plus:SI (reg/v:SI 40) (reg/v:SI 42)))
(set (reg:SI 44) (plus:SI (reg/v:SI 37) (reg:SI 43)))
(set (mem/s:SF (reg:SI 44)) (reg:SF 45))
where 40 is i, the induction variable pseudo
42 is offset
37 is &dst
Ideally, the redundant address calculations should be hoisted out of
the loop. Is this within the scope of the current loop optimiser?
Michael.
reply other threads:[~1997-11-04 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=199711050335.QAA19282@ongaonga.chch.cri.nz \
--to=michaelh@ongaonga.chch.cri.nz \
--cc=egcs@cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).