From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Lipe To: Mumit Khan Cc: Theodore Papadopoulo , egcs@cygnus.com, Max Lawson Subject: Re: Typename5.C failure i386-linux-gnulibc1 [Re: egcs-971127: testsuiteresults on i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1] Date: Mon, 01 Dec 1997 11:33:00 -0000 Message-id: <19971201133143.48258@dgii.com> References: <199712011512.QAA18311@mururoa.inria.fr> X-SW-Source: 1997-12/msg00056.html > > From the other reports I see, you seem more to be the exception than > > the average case or maybe your are the only one with RH4.1 which seems > > for the results from Peter Schmid, posted on Nov. 29. He also does not see > the failure for typename5.C that you see. Max Lawson's message that shows Perhaps there's some sort of slippery x86 thing going on here, becuase typename5.C fails on i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4, too. See: http://www.cygnus.com/ml/egcs/1997-Nov/0950.html Interestingly, it seems to be a recent failure. $ grep typename5.C */*.sum coff-971123/g++.sum:PASS: g++.pt/typename5.C (test for excess errors) coff-971129/g++.sum:FAIL: g++.pt/typename5.C (test for excess errors) elf-971123/g++.sum:PASS: g++.pt/typename5.C (test for excess errors) elf-971129/g++.sum:FAIL: g++.pt/typename5.C (test for excess errors)