* 1201 on OpenServer looks excellent!
@ 1997-12-02 11:25 Robert Lipe
1997-12-02 16:29 ` Jeffrey A Law
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robert Lipe @ 1997-12-02 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: egcs
Pretty much as we expected.
The ELF tests are consistent with most other ELF x86 targets. The ones
that fail are becuase of missing -lio.
The COFF tests that uniquely fail are becuase of the static initializer
thing or the mixture of -mcoff and -fpic or the g77 case of it not being
multilibbed.
Ship That Sucker! :-)
RJL
coff-971202/g++.sum
Test Run By robertl on Tue Dec 2 12:15:57 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4
=== g++ tests ===
XPASS: g++.jason/destruct3.C - (test for bogus messages, line 38)
FAIL: g++.jason/thunk2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/profile1.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast1.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast2.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh30.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.mike/init1.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/p2736.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/p4750.C (test for excess errors)
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 3392
# of unexpected failures 6
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 82
# of untested testcases 6
./negcs version egcs-2.90.20 971201 (gcc2-970802 experimental)
Test Run By robertl on Tue Dec 2 12:15:57 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4
=== g++ tests ===
XPASS: g++.jason/destruct3.C - (test for bogus messages, line 38)
FAIL: g++.jason/thunk2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/profile1.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast1.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast2.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh30.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.mike/init1.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/p2736.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/p4750.C (test for excess errors)
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 3392
# of unexpected failures 6
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 82
# of untested testcases 6
./negcs version egcs-2.90.20 971201 (gcc2-970802 experimental)
coff-971202/gcc.sum
Test Run By robertl on Tue Dec 2 10:48:35 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4
=== gcc tests ===
FAIL: gcov failed: couldn't execute "./gcov": no such file or directory
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 4882
# of unexpected failures 1
# of expected failures 5
# of unsupported tests 7
./negcs version egcs-2.90.20 971201 (gcc2-970802 experimental)
Test Run By robertl on Tue Dec 2 10:48:35 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4
=== gcc tests ===
FAIL: gcov failed: couldn't execute "./gcov": no such file or directory
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 4882
# of unexpected failures 1
# of expected failures 5
# of unsupported tests 7
./negcs version egcs-2.90.20 971201 (gcc2-970802 experimental)
coff-971202/libio.sum
Test Run By robertl on Tue Dec 2 13:00:09 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4
=== libio tests ===
FAIL: tfformat.c compilation
FAIL: tiformat.c compilation
FAIL: tiomisc.cc output
FAIL: tstdiomisc.c compilation
=== libio Summary ===
# of expected passes 32
# of unexpected failures 4
# of expected failures 4
Test Run By robertl on Tue Dec 2 13:00:09 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4
=== libio tests ===
FAIL: tfformat.c compilation
FAIL: tiformat.c compilation
FAIL: tiomisc.cc output
FAIL: tstdiomisc.c compilation
=== libio Summary ===
# of expected passes 32
# of unexpected failures 4
# of expected failures 4
coff-971202/libstdc++.sum
Test Run By robertl on Tue Dec 2 13:04:12 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4
=== libstdc++ tests ===
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 30
Test Run By robertl on Tue Dec 2 13:04:12 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4
=== libstdc++ tests ===
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 30
elf-971202/g++.sum
Test Run By robertl on Tue Dec 2 11:36:18 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4
=== g++ tests ===
XPASS: g++.jason/destruct3.C - (test for bogus messages, line 38)
FAIL: g++.law/profile1.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast1.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast2.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 3398
# of unexpected failures 1
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 81
# of untested testcases 6
./negcs version egcs-2.90.20 971201 (gcc2-970802 experimental)
Test Run By robertl on Tue Dec 2 11:36:18 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4
=== g++ tests ===
XPASS: g++.jason/destruct3.C - (test for bogus messages, line 38)
FAIL: g++.law/profile1.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast1.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast2.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 3398
# of unexpected failures 1
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 81
# of untested testcases 6
./negcs version egcs-2.90.20 971201 (gcc2-970802 experimental)
elf-971202/g77.sum
Test Run By robertl on Tue Dec 2 12:56:47 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4
=== g77 tests ===
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected passes 130
# of unexpected failures 2
/play/negcs/gcc/g77 version egcs-2.90.20 971201 (gcc2-970802 experimental)
Test Run By robertl on Tue Dec 2 12:56:47 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4
=== g77 tests ===
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected passes 130
# of unexpected failures 2
/play/negcs/gcc/g77 version egcs-2.90.20 971201 (gcc2-970802 experimental)
elf-971202/gcc.sum
Test Run By robertl on Tue Dec 2 10:09:18 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4
=== gcc tests ===
FAIL: gcov failed: couldn't execute "./gcov": no such file or directory
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 4882
# of unexpected failures 1
# of expected failures 5
# of unsupported tests 7
./negcs version egcs-2.90.20 971201 (gcc2-970802 experimental)
Test Run By robertl on Tue Dec 2 10:09:18 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4
=== gcc tests ===
FAIL: gcov failed: couldn't execute "./gcov": no such file or directory
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 4882
# of unexpected failures 1
# of expected failures 5
# of unsupported tests 7
./negcs version egcs-2.90.20 971201 (gcc2-970802 experimental)
elf-971202/libio.sum
Test Run By robertl on Tue Dec 2 12:58:00 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4
=== libio tests ===
FAIL: tfformat.c compilation
FAIL: tiformat.c compilation
FAIL: tiomisc.cc output
FAIL: tstdiomisc.c compilation
=== libio Summary ===
# of expected passes 32
# of unexpected failures 4
# of expected failures 4
Test Run By robertl on Tue Dec 2 12:58:00 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4
=== libio tests ===
FAIL: tfformat.c compilation
FAIL: tiformat.c compilation
FAIL: tiomisc.cc output
FAIL: tstdiomisc.c compilation
=== libio Summary ===
# of expected passes 32
# of unexpected failures 4
# of expected failures 4
elf-971202/libstdc++.sum
Test Run By robertl on Tue Dec 2 13:02:03 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4
=== libstdc++ tests ===
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 30
Test Run By robertl on Tue Dec 2 13:02:03 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4
=== libstdc++ tests ===
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 30
--
Robert Lipe http://www.dgii.com/people/robertl robertl@dgii.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: 1201 on OpenServer looks excellent!
1997-12-02 11:25 1201 on OpenServer looks excellent! Robert Lipe
@ 1997-12-02 16:29 ` Jeffrey A Law
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1997-12-02 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Lipe; +Cc: egcs
In message < 19971202132444.29908@dgii.com >you write:
> Pretty much as we expected.
>
> The ELF tests are consistent with most other ELF x86 targets. The ones
> that fail are becuase of missing -lio.
>
> The COFF tests that uniquely fail are becuase of the static initializer
> thing or the mixture of -mcoff and -fpic or the g77 case of it not being
> multilibbed.
>
> Ship That Sucker! :-)
Cool. Midnight Utah time is the plan :-)
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1997-12-02 16:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1997-12-02 11:25 1201 on OpenServer looks excellent! Robert Lipe
1997-12-02 16:29 ` Jeffrey A Law
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).