__eprintf problem in f77

__eprintf problem in f77

[Andrew Zabolotny]

There was a problem with __eprintf before in cc1/cc1plus, then it disappeared somewhere in last patches before
egcs-1.0 release. But it is still present in the f771 compiler.

problem:
 when building the entire bulk of compilers, make stops at gcc/f/fini.c with the ld diagnostics
 "undefined symbol __eprintf in fini.o"
cause:
 gcc/assert.h defines assert() to call __eprintf when assertion fails.
 fini.c includes some .h file which in turn includes assert.h.
 __eprintf is not present in default libraries when using cc
solution:
 define assert() in fini.c same way as in, for example, f/com.c, i.e:

/* This is used by the `assert' macro.  It is provided in libgcc.a,
   which `cc' doesn't know how to link.  Note that the C++ front-end
   no longer actually uses the `assert' macro (instead, it calls
   my_friendly_assert).  But all of the back-end files still need this.  */
void
__eprintf (string, expression, line, filename)
#ifdef __STDC__
     const char *string;
     const char *expression;
     unsigned line;
     const char *filename;
#else
     char *string;
     char *expression;
     unsigned line;
     char *filename;
#endif
{
  fprintf (stderr, string, expression, line, filename);
  fflush (stderr);
  abort ();
}

Greetings,
    _\ndy@teamOS/2

Re: __eprintf problem in f77

[Dave Love]

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Zabolotny <bit@freya.etu.ru> writes:

 Andrew>  "undefined symbol __eprintf in fini.o"
 Andrew> cause:
 Andrew>  gcc/assert.h defines assert() to call __eprintf when assertion fails.
 Andrew>  fini.c includes some .h file which in turn includes assert.h.
 Andrew>  __eprintf is not present in default libraries when using cc

I'm not sure what exactly this comes from.  Do you mean you're
building f771 not with gcc?  If so, it shouldn't have got that far --
the fortran component still needs to be built with gcc AFAIK and
should fall over an #error otherwise.

Re: __eprintf problem in f77

[Andrew Zabolotny]

On 10 Dec 1997 20:21:51 +0000, Dave Love wrote:

> Andrew>  "undefined symbol __eprintf in fini.o"
> Andrew> cause:
> Andrew>  gcc/assert.h defines assert() to call __eprintf when assertion fails.
> Andrew>  fini.c includes some .h file which in turn includes assert.h.
> Andrew>  __eprintf is not present in default libraries when using cc
>I'm not sure what exactly this comes from.  Do you mean you're
>building f771 not with gcc?  
Of course not. I'm building f771 in the whole egcs context.

Let me describe the problem more detailed:

When I run make in egcs/gcc subdirectory it compiles almost everything
with egcs/gcc being the current
directory. Since one of GCC options is -I. it will catch "assert.h" from
current directory, which will define
assert() to call __eprintf on failure. The system header file assert.h
defines assert in a different way, and the
system libraries doesn't contain __eprintf (although __eprintf is
contained in libgcc). However, egcs/gcc/f/fini.c is compiled/linked with
the _system_ compiler, which doesn't know where from to take __eprintf. So
fini.c compilation fails. (this is the only thing that fails diring
compilation -- other programs either doesn't use __eprintf,
or provide a __eprintf themself). So to resolve this problem it is needed
to define __eprintf inside f/fini.c

Greetings,
    _\ndy@teamOS/2

Re: __eprintf problem in f77

[Dave Love]

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Zabolotny <bit@freya.etu.ru> writes:

 Andrew> However, egcs/gcc/f/fini.c is compiled/linked with the
 Andrew> _system_ compiler, which doesn't know where from to take
 Andrew> __eprintf. So fini.c compilation fails. 

Sorry, I see.  I'd forgotten what fini is, but I'm puzzled why this
hasn't emerged before on bug-g77...  For my information, on what
platform does it show up?

Re: __eprintf problem in f77

[Andrew Zabolotny]

On 12 Dec 1997 18:15:21 +0000, Dave Love wrote:

>Sorry, I see.  I'd forgotten what fini is, 
its used to prepare something for the Fortran compiler.

>but I'm puzzled why this
>hasn't emerged before on bug-g77...  For my information, on what
>platform does it show up?
i?86-ibm-os2 with gcc/emx 2.7.2.1.

Greetings,
    _\ndy@teamOS/2