From: Laurent Bonnaud <bonnaud@irisa.fr>
To: egcs@cygnus.com
Cc: bonnaud@irisa.fr
Subject: Re: Strange results on code speed
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 05:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199712101330.OAA25517@coelacanthe.irisa.fr> (raw)
> You might want to retry your tests with -O4 or so. At -O2 function
>inlining is not done, I believe, and that might well make a big
>difference.
According to the doc, -O3 is the highest optimization level available
and -O3 does inlining indeed. In fact i used the -O2 option on
purpose, as the code is written with inline directives where they are
needed. Nevertheless, i tried your suggestion, but the speed
difference is not significant.
--
Laurent.
next reply other threads:[~1997-12-10 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-12-10 5:31 Laurent Bonnaud [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-12-09 16:25 Laurent Bonnaud
1997-12-10 0:16 ` Mark Mitchell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=199712101330.OAA25517@coelacanthe.irisa.fr \
--to=bonnaud@irisa.fr \
--cc=egcs@cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).