From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Manfred Hollstein <manfred@s-direktnet.de>
To: rms@gnu.org
Cc: law@cygnus.com, Manfred.Hollstein@ks.sel.alcatel.de, oliva@dcc.unicamp.br, gcc2@cygnus.com, egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: New problems with gcc-2.8.0 based code - NOW FIXED!
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 1997 11:08:00 -0000
Message-id: <199712291731.SAA07152@saturn.s-direktnet.de>
References: <9712110707.AA07283@lts.sel.alcatel.de> <26361.882821354@hurl.cygnus.com> <199712261411.PAA00654@saturn.s-direktnet.de> <199712271650.RAA00440@saturn.s-direktnet.de> <199712290718.AAA13426@wijiji.santafe.edu>
X-SW-Source: 1997-12/msg01211.html

On Mon, 29 December 1997, 00:18:31, rms@santafe.edu wrote:

 >     Just compiled my 2.1.76 kernel once  again this time using egcs-971225
 >     to see if the `-funroll-all-loops' still persists.
 > 
 >     IT'S FIXED!
 > 
 > Is it fixed in the latest GCC snapshot?  If not, the job isn't done
 > yet.  Can someone identify what change deals with this, and get it
 > installed in GCC?
 > 

I just tried the latest gcc2 snapshot (971225), and it's not fixed. Only
egcs-971225 works correctly. I have no idea though, whether it's actually
a gcc or a Linux bug (the fact that linux-2.1.76 works ok with
`-funroll-all-loops' while 2.0.33 doesn't indicates perhaps that Linux is
to blame).

Manfred