* i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4 results for 1.0.1
@ 1998-01-07 14:47 J. Kean Johnston
1998-01-07 19:17 ` Robert Lipe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: J. Kean Johnston @ 1998-01-07 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: EGCS Mailing List
All, here are the results. The only ones which worry me are the GCC failures
on 921215-1.c, 931002-1.c and nestfunc-1.c in ELF mode. They ONLY fail
in ELF mode, and they all seem to be related to trampolines. I can give
assembler output to anyone who cases about this. I certainly dont know
what to do with it. Other than that, it looks good. I applied my patch
to sco5.h to allow gcc -static to work BTW, but that wont affect any
of the tests.
I personally think that its great that the compiler passes ALL of the
GCC tests in normal(ELF) and COFF mode, with only those 3 failures in PIC
mode. I wish though, someone could explain the G++ bugs to me. The g77
bugs in PIC mode are a known failure. The PIC code is emitting an
illegal instruction.
But other than that, this is looking real real good. Well done everyone.
Kean.
Results of tests in file g++.sum:
XPASS: g++.jason/destruct3.C - (test for bogus messages, line 38)
FAIL: g++.jason/thunk2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/profile1.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast1.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast2.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh30.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.mike/init1.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/p2736.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/p4750.C (test for excess errors)
=== g++ Summary for unix/-mcoff ===
# of expected passes 3392
# of unexpected failures 6
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 82
# of untested testcases 6
XPASS: g++.jason/destruct3.C - (test for bogus messages, line 38)
FAIL: g++.law/profile1.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast1.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast2.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary for unix/-melf ===
# of expected passes 3398
# of unexpected failures 1
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 81
# of untested testcases 6
XPASS: g++.jason/destruct3.C - (test for bogus messages, line 38)
FAIL: g++.law/profile1.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast1.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast2.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary for unix/-fPIC ===
# of expected passes 3398
# of unexpected failures 1
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 81
# of untested testcases 6
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 10188
# of unexpected failures 8
# of unexpected successes 9
# of expected failures 244
# of untested testcases 18
Results of tests in file g77.sum:
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
=== g77 Summary for unix/-mcoff ===
# of expected passes 130
# of unexpected failures 2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
=== g77 Summary for unix/-melf ===
# of expected passes 130
# of unexpected failures 2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/compile/alpha1.f, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/compile/alpha1.f, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/compile/alpha1.f, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/cabs.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/cabs.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/cabs.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/cabs.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/claus.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/claus.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/claus.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/claus.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/complex_1.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/complex_1.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/complex_1.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/complex_1.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dcomplex.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dcomplex.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dcomplex.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dcomplex.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/erfc.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/erfc.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/erfc.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/erfc.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/exp.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/exp.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/exp.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/exp.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/le.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/le.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/short.f compilation, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/short.f compilation, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/short.f compilation, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/short.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/short.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/short.f compilation, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
=== g77 Summary for unix/-fPIC ===
# of expected passes 53
# of unexpected failures 41
# of untested testcases 38
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected passes 313
# of unexpected failures 45
# of untested testcases 38
Results of tests in file gcc.sum:
=== gcc Summary for unix/-mcoff ===
# of expected passes 4883
# of expected failures 5
# of unsupported tests 7
=== gcc Summary for unix/-melf ===
# of expected passes 4883
# of expected failures 5
# of unsupported tests 7
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/921215-1.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/921215-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/921215-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/921215-1.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/931002-1.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/931002-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/931002-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/931002-1.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/nestfunc-1.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/nestfunc-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/nestfunc-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/nestfunc-1.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-1.c execution test
FAIL: gcov-1.c:1:is 4:should be 11
FAIL: gcov-1.c:1:is 5:should be 10
FAIL: gcov-1.c:1:is 7:should be 1
FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-2.c execution test (PRMS 8294)
=== gcc Summary for unix/-fPIC ===
# of expected passes 4868
# of unexpected failures 17
# of expected failures 5
# of unsupported tests 7
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 14634
# of unexpected failures 17
# of expected failures 15
# of unsupported tests 21
Results of tests in file libio.sum:
=== libio Summary for unix/-mcoff ===
# of expected passes 40
=== libio Summary for unix/-melf ===
# of expected passes 40
=== libio Summary for unix/-fPIC ===
# of expected passes 40
=== libio Summary ===
# of expected passes 120
Results of tests in file libstdc++.sum:
=== libstdc++ Summary for unix/-mcoff ===
# of expected passes 30
=== libstdc++ Summary for unix/-melf ===
# of expected passes 30
=== libstdc++ Summary for unix/-fPIC ===
# of expected passes 30
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 90
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4 results for 1.0.1
1998-01-07 14:47 i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4 results for 1.0.1 J. Kean Johnston
@ 1998-01-07 19:17 ` Robert Lipe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robert Lipe @ 1998-01-07 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: J. Kean Johnston; +Cc: EGCS Mailing List
> All, here are the results. The only ones which worry me are the GCC failures
> on 921215-1.c, 931002-1.c and nestfunc-1.c in ELF mode. They ONLY fail
Those would worry me, too. They would represent a regression from
1.0.
What worries me more is that you're seeing them fail and I'm not.
I see that you got these failures on the your Jan 1 test of the 1225,
yet when I submitted my test results on 12/27 of the 1225 snap, I
didn't get the failure.
You and I should compare our assembler source files. Something is
different.
> I personally think that its great that the compiler passes ALL of the
> GCC tests in normal(ELF) and COFF mode, with only those 3 failures in PIC
> mode. I wish though, someone could explain the G++ bugs to me. The g77
I did some analysis of the problem, but haven't messed with it since.
http://www.cygnus.com/ml/egcs/1997-Nov/0992.html
RJL
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1998-01-07 19:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1998-01-07 14:47 i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4 results for 1.0.1 J. Kean Johnston
1998-01-07 19:17 ` Robert Lipe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).