* Re: delete (nothrow) ?
@ 1998-01-20 4:00 Mike Stump
1998-01-20 18:39 ` Joe Buck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mike Stump @ 1998-01-20 4:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: egcs, ram
> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 11:05:44 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Munagala V. S. Ramanath" <ram@netcom.com>
> To: egcs@cygnus.com
> Are the remaining variants planned for a future release ?
You can assume that every feature of the C++ language is planned for a
future release. So the answer to your question is trivially yes.
Your next question is, when will it be done, we have no answer to any
of those types of questions. When you write the code and donate it
(or pay someone else to do the work for you) is about the best answer
I know of.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: delete (nothrow) ?
1998-01-20 4:00 delete (nothrow) ? Mike Stump
@ 1998-01-20 18:39 ` Joe Buck
1998-01-23 16:33 ` Mark Mitchell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joe Buck @ 1998-01-20 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Stump; +Cc: egcs, ram
> > Are the remaining variants planned for a future release ?
>
> You can assume that every feature of the C++ language is planned for a
> future release. So the answer to your question is trivially yes.
I suspect that the real question being asked is "is someone currently
working or planning to work on it?". For some missing features, the
answer is that someone is working on it (e.g. many of the missing standard
C++ classes). For others, the answer is that no one is working on it.
> Your next question is, when will it be done, we have no answer to any
> of those types of questions. When you write the code and donate it
> (or pay someone else to do the work for you) is about the best answer
> I know of.
This is the traditional way that we blow people off, and it does have
a certain amount of validity, but it would probably serve us better
to be more public about who is working on what, so we don't wind up
with two versions of feature X and no version of feature Y.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: delete (nothrow) ?
1998-01-23 16:33 ` Mark Mitchell
@ 1998-01-23 9:47 ` Jeffrey A Law
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1998-01-23 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mmitchell; +Cc: Joe Buck, Jason Merrill, Mike Stump, egcs, ram
In message < 199801220813.IAA11231@quickstep.stanford.edu >you write:
>
> >>>>> "Joe" == Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com> writes:
>
> Joe> does have a certain amount of validity, but it would probably
> Joe> serve us better to be more public about who is working on
> Joe> what, so we don't wind up with two versions of feature X and
> Joe> no version of feature Y.
>
> I agree. Jeff or Jason, would it be possible to have a PROJECTS file
> in egcs that indicated who is working on what? Then, we could send
> you patches to the PROJECTS file just like any other patch.
It's actually started :-) So you can send diffs to it just like you would
any other file :-)
egcs/gcc/PROJECTS
One could certainly argue that it should move up a level in the directory
structure.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: delete (nothrow) ?
1998-01-20 18:39 ` Joe Buck
@ 1998-01-23 16:33 ` Mark Mitchell
1998-01-23 9:47 ` Jeffrey A Law
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mark Mitchell @ 1998-01-23 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joe Buck, Jeffrey A. Law, Jason Merrill; +Cc: Mike Stump, egcs, ram
>>>>> "Joe" == Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com> writes:
Joe> does have a certain amount of validity, but it would probably
Joe> serve us better to be more public about who is working on
Joe> what, so we don't wind up with two versions of feature X and
Joe> no version of feature Y.
I agree. Jeff or Jason, would it be possible to have a PROJECTS file
in egcs that indicated who is working on what? Then, we could send
you patches to the PROJECTS file just like any other patch.
--
Mark Mitchell mmitchell@usa.net
Stanford University http://www.stanford.edu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: delete (nothrow) ?
[not found] <199801171905.LAA26882.cygnus.egcs@netcom2.netcom.com>
@ 1998-01-22 1:45 ` Jason Merrill
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jason Merrill @ 1998-01-22 1:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Munagala V. S. Ramanath, egcs
>>>>> Munagala V S Ramanath <ram@netcom.com> writes:
> The third edition of Stroustup's book lists (p. 576, Sec 19.4.5) six
> variants of new and delete. However, in the header file <new> of
> egcs-1.0.1 I find 6 variants of new but only these two variants
> of delete:
> void operator delete (void *) throw();
> void operator delete[] (void *) throw();
> Are the remaining variants planned for a future release ?
You will find that the development sources include the remaining variants.
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* delete (nothrow) ?
@ 1998-01-17 22:30 Munagala V. S. Ramanath
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Munagala V. S. Ramanath @ 1998-01-17 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: egcs
The third edition of Stroustup's book lists (p. 576, Sec 19.4.5) six
variants of new and delete. However, in the header file <new> of
egcs-1.0.1 I find 6 variants of new but only these two variants
of delete:
void operator delete (void *) throw();
void operator delete[] (void *) throw();
Are the remaining variants planned for a future release ?
In case it matters, my system is a SunOS 4.1.2 Sparc 2 box and the
header file <new> is for some reason located in:
prefix/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-sunos4.1.2/egcs-2.90.23/include
rather than:
prefix/include/g++
even though it appears in its entirety to be a GNU file and _not_
derived by running fixincludes on any Sun include file.
Ram
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1998-01-23 16:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1998-01-20 4:00 delete (nothrow) ? Mike Stump
1998-01-20 18:39 ` Joe Buck
1998-01-23 16:33 ` Mark Mitchell
1998-01-23 9:47 ` Jeffrey A Law
[not found] <199801171905.LAA26882.cygnus.egcs@netcom2.netcom.com>
1998-01-22 1:45 ` Jason Merrill
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1998-01-17 22:30 Munagala V. S. Ramanath
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).