From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Buck To: hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu) Cc: law@cygnus.com, egcs@cygnus.com Subject: Re: egcs 1.0.2 Date: Sun, 15 Feb 1998 12:18:00 -0000 Message-id: <199802152017.MAA02043@atrus.synopsys.com> References: X-SW-Source: 1998-02/msg00714.html > I have 8 patches for egcs 1.0.2. I have sent 3 of them, which have > yet to be acked. Should I send my other 5 or should I wait for > the backlog to be cleared first? I gather that there is controversy about spending a lot of effort to fix "long double" in a minor release. I would think that if these changes will not affect code that does not use long double they will at least do no harm, and not being able to build glibc does make us look bad.