From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Robert Lipe <robertl@dgii.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Cc: egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: does linux -fPIC/eh do so poorly?
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 14:21:00 -0000
Message-id: <19980216150211.41958@dgii.com>
References: <19980216134338.34121@dgii.com> <m0y4WkF-00058fC@ocean.lucon.org>
X-SW-Source: 1998-02/msg00780.html

[ OpenServer, EGCS from 0216 ] 
> > 	 make check-g++ RUNTESTFLAGS="--tool_opts -fPIC old-deja.exp=eh*"
> > 
> >                 === g++ Summary ===
> > 
> > # of expected passes            66
> > # of unexpected failures        37


> # make check-g++ RUNTESTFLAGS="--tool_opts -fPIC old-deja.exp=eh*"
> 
>                 === g++ Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes            102
> # of untested testcases         1
> /home/work/gnu/bin/egcs/gcc/testsuite/../xgcc version egcs-2.90.24 980208 (egcs-1.0.2 prerelease)
> 
> It looks fine on linux. I have been working with egcs 1.0.2. I haven't
> built egcs for a few days now.


Thanx for the sanity test, H.J.


When I do the same in my 1.0.2 tree, I almost see the same thing you see.

                === g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes            103
/home/play/egcs-release/native/gcc/testsuite/../xgcc version egcs-2.90.24 980208
 (egcs-1.0.2 prerelease)



I better go do some digging here...