From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Buck To: drepper@cygnus.com Cc: hjl@lucon.org, egcs@cygnus.com Subject: Re: libio patches for glibc 2.1 Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 14:09:00 -0000 Message-id: <199802232209.OAA13696@atrus.synopsys.com> References: X-SW-Source: 1998-02/msg01081.html > I do understand this, of course. The problem is only that by putting > in more and more changes into egcs 1.0 it might not stabilize and > especially with volatile code like the egcs/glibc 2.1 interface this > might require even more changes once egcs 1.0.2 is out. You should > case about Jeff who really likes to devote his time on egcs 1.1 > instead of another 1.0 release. How can the egcs/glibc interface be made less volatile? What factors are causing the problems? (Clearly these can't all be fixed for egcs 1.0.x, but it would be nice if egcs and glibc weren't always breaking each other).