From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel.Dos-Reis@dptmaths.ens-cachan.fr>
To: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
Cc: g++@cygnus.com, egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: implicit declaration in C++ considered harmful
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1998 07:35:00 -0000
Message-id: <199804081431.QAA13845@piano.dptmaths.ens-cachan.fr>
References: <199804080026.RAA28665@atrus.synopsys.com>
X-SW-Source: 1998-04/msg00319.html

>>>>> «Joe», Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com> wrote:

Joe> First, it should be an error, not a warning.  Second, the compiler should
Joe> insert an error node, not a function returning integer, so that we don't
Joe> get a cascade of errors.

100% agreed.

Joe> Is there anyone who really wants the existing behavior?

I think EGCS should be standard conforming and flags implicit
declaration as an error not a warning.

-- Gaby
"One reason that life is complex is that it has a 
real part and imaginary part." -- Andrew Koenig