From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
To: kaz@cafe.net (Kaz Kylheku)
Cc: Gabriel.Dos-Reis@dptmaths.ens-cachan.fr, Joe@synopsys.com, Buck@synopsys.com, jbuck@synopsys.com, g++@cygnus.com, egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: RE: implicit declaration in C++ considered harmful
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1998 17:25:00 -0000
Message-id: <199804082207.PAA24305@atrus.synopsys.com>
References: <01BD62F9.19A03370.kaz@cafe.net>
X-SW-Source: 1998-04/msg00348.html

> > I think EGCS should be standard conforming and flags implicit
> > declaration as an error not a warning.
> 
> The C and C++ standards don't distinguish errors and warnings,
> though I say this with somewhat less than full confidence because
> I'm not as familiar with the C++ draft as with the C standard.

Yes, we technically comply, but nevertheless the current behavior
is not desirable.