From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Philippe De Muyter" To: ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu (Kaveh R. Ghazi) Cc: bothner@cygnus.com, egcs@cygnus.com, law@cygnus.com Subject: Re: egcs, does gcc fixincludes etc guarantee a stdlib.h exists? Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 07:45:00 -0000 Message-id: <199804141445.QAA02737@mail.macqel.be> References: <199804141433.KAA28154@caip.rutgers.edu> X-SW-Source: 1998-04/msg00530.html > I considered doing that, but I wasn't completely sure defining > that macro unconditionally in libgcc2.c or frame.c was a good idea. Are > we guaranteed that defining __USE_FIXED_PROTOTYPES__ is safe for all > platforms? (I don't know, I'm asking.) If it is safe, then why does the > wrapper exist at all? ... IIRC there are some functions for which the generated prototype is wrong on some platforms (I do not remember which functions), but if you only want to get the prototype for malloc then it is safe to define __USE_FIXED_PROTOTYPES__.