From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Richard Henderson <rth@cygnus.com>
To: Mark Hatle <fray@eel2.cs.mankato.msus.edu>
Cc: egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Inline functions
Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 15:33:00 -0000
Message-id: <19980512153429.23175@dot.cygnus.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980512121158.12719B-100000@EEL2.cs.mankato.msus.edu>
X-SW-Source: 1998-05/msg00426.html

On Tue, May 12, 1998 at 12:15:28PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> When I compile without optimizations I get linking errors indicating that
> none of the inline functions were "compiled into" the object file then I
> removed the "-O2" from... I have also tried -O, -O0, -O1 and they produce
> the same results.  One advice from someone, I tried to add
> -fkeep-inline-functions and got the same outcome.

This is primarily due to the is the effect of `extern inline'
seen throughout the Linux kernel sources.

Though -O1 should have worked... I wonder what's up with that.

> How can I compile selected files in the Linux server without optimization
> and still have the inline functions inline? (or at least compile as
> regular functions in that object file?)

You can't. 

Your best option is to change problematic ocurrences of
`extern inline' to `static inline'.


r~