From: Marc Lehmann <pcg@goof.com>
To: egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: x86 double alignment (was egcs-1.1 release schedule)
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 17:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19980624192457.45730@cerebro.laendle> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m0yoUM1-000267C@ocean.lucon.org>
On Tue, Jun 23, 1998 at 07:47:24AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> I believe Marc's patch doesn't change ABI by default. But you can
Sorry for me first sending the patch and then reading the list ;) I actually
have a backlog of >600 messages on egcs and just found this thread when
Bernd asked me about the double-alignment patch.
> turn on some optimizations by hand which will change ABI. But if
The original patch turned on -mstack-align-double, which I thought is safe,
but it isn't. I got a report from a windows user that it breaks most windows
function semantics, as these functions deallocate the stack themselves. In
this case, -mstack-align-double will break the program.
If we had -mstack-align-double in egcs, maybe glibc could compile _some_ functions
(like qsort or __libc_start) with it, so the problem of combine breaking code
is solved, so we can either
- document that -mno-stack-align-double should be used when linking against third-party-libs
- not making it on by default.
there are also speed issues, i.e. in integer-only programs, -mstack-align-double
slows down code (a bit), so it should probably be disabled anyway.
-marg-align-double never worked, due to limitations in calls.c (FUNCTION_ARG_BOUNDARY
is effectively ignored on calls, but not within the called function), and
breaks the abi, and was thus always optional. (it would align doubles in the
argument area, this _severely_ breaks the abi, of course)
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@goof.com |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-06-24 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-06-18 1:32 egcs-1.1 release schedule Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-19 9:02 ` Gerald Pfeifer
1998-06-19 23:47 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-19 11:57 ` Dave Love
1998-06-21 21:43 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-21 23:07 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-22 5:19 ` David S. Miller
1998-06-22 12:04 ` Dave Love
1998-06-22 13:45 ` Toon Moene
1998-06-22 22:29 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-22 18:20 ` ix86 double alignment (was Re: egcs-1.1 release schedule) Craig Burley
1998-06-23 3:32 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-23 5:13 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-23 3:32 ` David S. Miller
1998-06-23 6:30 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-22 12:04 ` ix86 `double' " Craig Burley
1998-06-23 3:32 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-23 5:13 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-24 2:28 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-24 14:50 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-25 0:25 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-25 9:59 ` Tim Hollebeek
1998-06-28 18:01 ` Marc Lehmann
1998-06-22 12:04 ` egcs-1.1 release schedule Dave Love
1998-06-23 3:32 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-23 3:32 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-23 9:29 ` H.J. Lu
1998-06-24 17:12 ` Marc Lehmann [this message]
1998-06-25 0:25 ` x86 double alignment (was egcs-1.1 release schedule) Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-28 18:02 ` Marc Lehmann
1998-06-25 12:33 ` PÃ¥l-Kristian Engstad
1998-06-28 18:02 ` Marc Lehmann
1998-06-25 21:48 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-25 18:53 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-28 22:41 ` Marc Lehmann
1998-06-29 5:20 ` Martin Kahlert
1998-06-29 11:08 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-29 19:43 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-29 20:41 ` Craig Burley
1998-06-30 0:42 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-30 8:19 ` gcc2 merge H.J. Lu
1998-06-30 19:49 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-30 4:50 ` x86 double alignment (was egcs-1.1 release schedule) Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-20 6:41 ` egcs-1.1 release schedule Gabriel Dos Reis
1998-06-20 9:22 ` Joe Buck
1998-06-20 15:36 ` Mark Mitchell
1998-06-21 0:07 ` Jeffrey A Law
1998-06-26 7:16 x86 double alignment (was egcs-1.1 release schedule) Michael Meissner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19980624192457.45730@cerebro.laendle \
--to=pcg@goof.com \
--cc=egcs@cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).