From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: law@cygnus.com
Cc: rearnsha@sun52.arm.com, egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Will the consistent failures in EGCS be fixed soon? 
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 06:50:00 -0000
Message-id: <199806251153.MAA14147@sun52.NIS.cambridge>
References: <25494.898733105@hurl.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 1998-06/msg00899.html

> The loop* things aren't likely to be addressed anytime soon.  They
> are horribly obscure problems that nobody is likely to ever trigger
> unless they go look at the gcc source code and specifically write
> code to trigger a specific problem in the loop optimizer.
> 
> There's also an alias bug in the testsuite that we aren't actively
> working on, but we do want to keep the test because we do want to
> fix the problem at some point.
> 

So shouldn't these be marked as XFAILs?  Then I won't waste time looking 
into the failure in case it is a port problem.

Richard.