From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
To: bothner@cygnus.com (Per Bothner)
Cc: jbuck@synopsys.com, egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: egcs-1.0.3a on DEC Alpha / DU4.0b: typedef of ulong in types.h
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 17:47:00 -0000
Message-id: <199807170047.RAA23473@atrus.synopsys.com>
References: <199807170038.RAA24234@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 1998-07/msg00588.html

> > That is a bit confusing.  Clearly ANSI doesn't restrict what sys/types.h
> > does, but doesn't Posix?  That is, isn't it technically illegal under
> > Posix for sys/types.h to define ulong ?
> 
> Correct.  That is reasonable clarification of what I said less clearly.

Does/should fixinclude try to fix Posix violations, or only ANSI/ISO
violations?  (I suppose it can't do it in general since many gcc targets
aren't really Posix).