From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marc Lehmann <pcg@goof.com>
To: Craig Burley <burley@gnu.org>, hjstein@bfr.co.il
Cc: bosch@gnat.com, moshier@mediaone.net, egcs@cygnus.com, tprince@cat.e-mail.com
Subject: Re: FWD: FLOATING-POINT CONSISTENCY, -FFLOAT-STORE, AND X86
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 14:54:00 -0000
Message-id: <19981217235340.O5893@cerebro.laendle>
References: <m2ogp34xwq.fsf@blinky.bfr.co.il> <199812171821.NAA29105@melange.gnu.org>
X-SW-Source: 1998-12/msg00668.html

On Thu, Dec 17, 1998 at 01:21:52PM -0500, Craig Burley wrote:
> >The choice is clear, at least for me.  I'm setting the FPU to 64 bit
> >mode in all my code.  Maybe I'll even put it in crt0.o.
> 
> Yup.  We should do this (whichever gives the most coverage) across
> the board in enough egcs snapshots to find out how it actually
> affects people, e.g. how much other code must be rewritten.

Will we warn for "long double"? ;->>>

      -----==-                                              |
      ----==-- _                                            |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann       +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg@goof.com       |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\                          --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                        |
                                                          |