From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Buck To: pderbysh@usa.net (Paul Derbyshire) Cc: egcs@egcs.cygnus.com, egcs-bugs@egcs.cygnus.com Subject: Re: Bug in libm or libstdc++. Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 15:34:00 -0000 Message-id: <199902242332.PAA09334@atrus.synopsys.com> In-reply-to: < 3.0.6.32.19990222090333.00847df0@pop.globalserve.net >; from "Paul Derbyshire" at Feb 22, 99 9:03 am References: <3.0.6.32.19990222090333.00847df0@pop.globalserve.net> X-SW-Source: 1999-02/msg01219.html [ no "long double" overloads of math functions ] > Stroustrup 3rd Ed definitely informs me that long double overloads for > these and other functions are supposed to be in either libm or libstdc++. You have already been informed that libstdc++ is not complete. Sorry. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Buck To: pderbysh@usa.net (Paul Derbyshire) Cc: egcs@egcs.cygnus.com, egcs-bugs@egcs.cygnus.com Subject: Re: Bug in libm or libstdc++. Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 22:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <199902242332.PAA09334@atrus.synopsys.com> References: <3.0.6.32.19990222090333.00847df0@pop.globalserve.net> X-SW-Source: 1999-02n/msg01228.html Message-ID: <19990228225300.THyoAllaL_Yx2xEKI9knh7oq28Hk_tAMqajNTwHLE-g@z> [ no "long double" overloads of math functions ] > Stroustrup 3rd Ed definitely informs me that long double overloads for > these and other functions are supposed to be in either libm or libstdc++. You have already been informed that libstdc++ is not complete. Sorry.