From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Cc: law@cygnus.com, egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Stabilization status
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 22:53:00 -0000
Message-ID: <vyzzp66u5nh.fsf@issan.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9902211859250.3380-100000@alphard.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
X-SW-Source: 1999-02n/msg01079.html
Message-ID: <19990228225300.JHUVfh2YcYeJDhlrK665wsGjs2-LQXyPP7cWBg286Rs@z>

Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> writes:

|> I agree that this is highly desirable. Just, which should be the base
|> format? texi or HTML?

Texinfo format can be trivially converted to HTML (in current pretests
this is done by makeinfo --html).  On the other hand, HTML is pretty
useless as a source format.

-- 
Andreas Schwab                                      "And now for something
schwab@issan.cs.uni-dortmund.de                      completely different"
schwab@gnu.org