From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no>
To: egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: egcs and linux
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 22:53:00 -0000
Message-ID: <whogmxdn6i.fsf@viffer.oslo.metis.no>
References: <13364.918948012@hurl.cygnus.com> <wh1zjtgnwy.fsf@viffer.oslo.metis.no> <199902141506.QAA09933@quatramaran.ens.fr>
X-SW-Source: 1999-02n/msg00577.html
Message-ID: <19990228225300.a3KCM9m-HE061vwKncyUQVOBHvkBY2fWjdqOPIEi4Zg@z>

>>>>> Marc Espie <espie@quatramaran.ens.fr>:

> In article < wh1zjtgnwy.fsf@viffer.oslo.metis.no > you write:

>> IMHO 1.1.2 should not be released at all, before it will work on linux
>> without patches.

> Your opinion doesn't matter. Clean code does.

How can the egcs code possibly be clean if egcs doesn't run correctly
on one of its most important platforms?

Boggles the mind!

Is it possible to put the HJ patches within linux-specific ifdefs?