* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT
@ 1999-03-23 11:32 John Wehle
[not found] ` < 199903231932.OAA08746@jwlab.FEITH.COM >
1999-03-31 23:46 ` John Wehle
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: John Wehle @ 1999-03-23 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc.Espie; +Cc: law, rth, egcs-patches, egcs
>> Anyway, I installed the FreeBSD & NetBSD changes from John. I also
>> installed a suitable fix for OpenBSD.
>
> Any reason you are using 0701 insted of
> (MASK_80387 | MASK_IEEE_FP | MASK_FLOAT_RETURNS | MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387) ?
He was probably just following my original patch which was created before
Richard updated the files to define TARGET_DEFAULT symbolicly.
-- John
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Feith Systems | Voice: 1-215-646-8000 | Email: john@feith.com |
| John Wehle | Fax: 1-215-540-5495 | |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread[parent not found: < 199903231932.OAA08746@jwlab.FEITH.COM >]
* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT [not found] ` < 199903231932.OAA08746@jwlab.FEITH.COM > @ 1999-03-23 17:26 ` Jeffrey A Law 1999-03-31 23:46 ` Jeffrey A Law 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1999-03-23 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: John Wehle; +Cc: Marc.Espie, rth, egcs-patches, egcs In message < 199903231932.OAA08746@jwlab.FEITH.COM >you write: > >> Anyway, I installed the FreeBSD & NetBSD changes from John. I also > >> installed a suitable fix for OpenBSD. > > > > Any reason you are using 0701 insted of > > (MASK_80387 | MASK_IEEE_FP | MASK_FLOAT_RETURNS | MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387) > ? > > He was probably just following my original patch which was created before > Richard updated the files to define TARGET_DEFAULT symbolicly. Precisely. I wasn't aware that we had switched to the symbolic form on the x86 port. I'll take care of it. Thanks, jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT 1999-03-23 17:26 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 1999-03-31 23:46 ` Jeffrey A Law 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1999-03-31 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: John Wehle; +Cc: Marc.Espie, rth, egcs-patches, egcs In message < 199903231932.OAA08746@jwlab.FEITH.COM >you write: > >> Anyway, I installed the FreeBSD & NetBSD changes from John. I also > >> installed a suitable fix for OpenBSD. > > > > Any reason you are using 0701 insted of > > (MASK_80387 | MASK_IEEE_FP | MASK_FLOAT_RETURNS | MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387) > ? > > He was probably just following my original patch which was created before > Richard updated the files to define TARGET_DEFAULT symbolicly. Precisely. I wasn't aware that we had switched to the symbolic form on the x86 port. I'll take care of it. Thanks, jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT 1999-03-23 11:32 patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT John Wehle [not found] ` < 199903231932.OAA08746@jwlab.FEITH.COM > @ 1999-03-31 23:46 ` John Wehle 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: John Wehle @ 1999-03-31 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc.Espie; +Cc: law, rth, egcs-patches, egcs >> Anyway, I installed the FreeBSD & NetBSD changes from John. I also >> installed a suitable fix for OpenBSD. > > Any reason you are using 0701 insted of > (MASK_80387 | MASK_IEEE_FP | MASK_FLOAT_RETURNS | MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387) ? He was probably just following my original patch which was created before Richard updated the files to define TARGET_DEFAULT symbolicly. -- John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Feith Systems | Voice: 1-215-646-8000 | Email: john@feith.com | | John Wehle | Fax: 1-215-540-5495 | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <199903201949.OAA02902@jwlab.FEITH.COM>]
[parent not found: <4352.922077370@upchuck>]
[parent not found: <19990322012913.A1330@cygnus.com>]
* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT [not found] ` <19990322012913.A1330@cygnus.com> @ 1999-03-22 8:16 ` espie [not found] ` < 19990322161606.32691.qmail@quatramaran.ens.fr > 1999-03-31 23:46 ` espie 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: espie @ 1999-03-22 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: rth; +Cc: egcs-patches, egcs In article <19990322012913.A1330@cygnus.com> you write: [about TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT and TARGET_DEFAULT for x86] >What John is rightly saying is that someone typo'd in this >particular instance. when I sit down and wrote the openbsd port, I looked at TARGET_DEFAULT, TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT, and put the current solution in (a target_cpu_default="MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387"). Are you saying that I should reconsider and override TARGET_DEFAULT instead ? What I did looked like a fairly good decision at the time... I followed the same rationale that Jeff outlined basically. If there are further issues involved in TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT vs. TARGET_DEFAULT, I'd like to be aware of these. As far as I know, there is not even any written documentation of TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT currently... maybe this should change ? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: < 19990322161606.32691.qmail@quatramaran.ens.fr >]
* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT [not found] ` < 19990322161606.32691.qmail@quatramaran.ens.fr > @ 1999-03-22 23:48 ` Jeffrey A Law [not found] ` < 3998.922174570@upchuck > 1999-03-31 23:46 ` Jeffrey A Law 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1999-03-22 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: espie; +Cc: rth, egcs-patches, egcs In message < 19990322161606.32691.qmail@quatramaran.ens.fr >you write: > when I sit down and wrote the openbsd port, I looked at TARGET_DEFAULT, > TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT, and put the current solution in > (a target_cpu_default="MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387"). > > Are you saying that I should reconsider and override TARGET_DEFAULT instead > ? > What I did looked like a fairly good decision at the time... I followed the > same rationale that Jeff outlined basically. Yea. It looks like the x86 port's handling of TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT is broken. As a result the configure.in change isn't doing what we want. Anyway, I installed the FreeBSD & NetBSD changes from John. I also installed a suitable fix for OpenBSD. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: < 3998.922174570@upchuck >]
* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT [not found] ` < 3998.922174570@upchuck > @ 1999-03-23 8:33 ` Marc Espie 1999-03-31 23:46 ` Marc Espie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Marc Espie @ 1999-03-23 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: law; +Cc: espie, rth, egcs-patches, egcs On Tue, Mar 23, 1999 at 12:36:10AM -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > Yea. It looks like the x86 port's handling of TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT is > broken. As a result the configure.in change isn't doing what we > want. > Anyway, I installed the FreeBSD & NetBSD changes from John. I also > installed a suitable fix for OpenBSD. Any reason you are using 0701 insted of (MASK_80387 | MASK_IEEE_FP | MASK_FLOAT_RETURNS | MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387) ? -- Marc Espie |anime, sf, juggling, unicycle, acrobatics, comics... |AmigaOS, OpenBSD, C++, perl, Icon, PostScript... | `real programmers don't die, they just get out of beta' ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT 1999-03-23 8:33 ` Marc Espie @ 1999-03-31 23:46 ` Marc Espie 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Marc Espie @ 1999-03-31 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: law; +Cc: espie, rth, egcs-patches, egcs On Tue, Mar 23, 1999 at 12:36:10AM -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > Yea. It looks like the x86 port's handling of TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT is > broken. As a result the configure.in change isn't doing what we > want. > Anyway, I installed the FreeBSD & NetBSD changes from John. I also > installed a suitable fix for OpenBSD. Any reason you are using 0701 insted of (MASK_80387 | MASK_IEEE_FP | MASK_FLOAT_RETURNS | MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387) ? -- Marc Espie |anime, sf, juggling, unicycle, acrobatics, comics... |AmigaOS, OpenBSD, C++, perl, Icon, PostScript... | `real programmers don't die, they just get out of beta' ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT 1999-03-22 23:48 ` Jeffrey A Law [not found] ` < 3998.922174570@upchuck > @ 1999-03-31 23:46 ` Jeffrey A Law 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1999-03-31 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: espie; +Cc: rth, egcs-patches, egcs In message < 19990322161606.32691.qmail@quatramaran.ens.fr >you write: > when I sit down and wrote the openbsd port, I looked at TARGET_DEFAULT, > TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT, and put the current solution in > (a target_cpu_default="MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387"). > > Are you saying that I should reconsider and override TARGET_DEFAULT instead > ? > What I did looked like a fairly good decision at the time... I followed the > same rationale that Jeff outlined basically. Yea. It looks like the x86 port's handling of TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT is broken. As a result the configure.in change isn't doing what we want. Anyway, I installed the FreeBSD & NetBSD changes from John. I also installed a suitable fix for OpenBSD. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT 1999-03-22 8:16 ` espie [not found] ` < 19990322161606.32691.qmail@quatramaran.ens.fr > @ 1999-03-31 23:46 ` espie 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: espie @ 1999-03-31 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: rth; +Cc: egcs-patches, egcs In article <19990322012913.A1330@cygnus.com> you write: [about TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT and TARGET_DEFAULT for x86] >What John is rightly saying is that someone typo'd in this >particular instance. when I sit down and wrote the openbsd port, I looked at TARGET_DEFAULT, TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT, and put the current solution in (a target_cpu_default="MASK_NO_FANCY_MATH_387"). Are you saying that I should reconsider and override TARGET_DEFAULT instead ? What I did looked like a fairly good decision at the time... I followed the same rationale that Jeff outlined basically. If there are further issues involved in TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT vs. TARGET_DEFAULT, I'd like to be aware of these. As far as I know, there is not even any written documentation of TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT currently... maybe this should change ? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1999-03-31 23:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-03-23 11:32 patch to fix i386 FreeBSD and NetBSD TARGET_DEFAULT John Wehle
[not found] ` < 199903231932.OAA08746@jwlab.FEITH.COM >
1999-03-23 17:26 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-03-31 23:46 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-03-31 23:46 ` John Wehle
[not found] <199903201949.OAA02902@jwlab.FEITH.COM>
[not found] ` <4352.922077370@upchuck>
[not found] ` <19990322012913.A1330@cygnus.com>
1999-03-22 8:16 ` espie
[not found] ` < 19990322161606.32691.qmail@quatramaran.ens.fr >
1999-03-22 23:48 ` Jeffrey A Law
[not found] ` < 3998.922174570@upchuck >
1999-03-23 8:33 ` Marc Espie
1999-03-31 23:46 ` Marc Espie
1999-03-31 23:46 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-03-31 23:46 ` espie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).