From: Gabriel Dos_Reis <Gabriel.Dos_Reis@sophia.inria.fr>
To: egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: i18n of egcs
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 23:15:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xaj3e1kndsf.fsf@korrigan.inria.fr> (raw)
Message-ID: <19990430231500.7HzPVZbvWpdxcV7iN0EiWujtxAKN9f2N3pHLasQ6ZxA@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199904290610.IAA00481@mira.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de>
"Martin v. Loewis" <martin@mira.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:
| > What was wrong with -std=c89 or -std=iso9899:1990 ?
|
| Nothing. I just question whether an -iso option is still justified, in
| the presence of these options.
Well, we can have a -iso option that defaults to the current standard
which can be overriden by -std= option. No?
gcc -iso # same as gcc -iso -std=c90 or gcc -ansi
gcc -iso -std=c9x
-- Gaby
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-04-30 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-04-27 11:43 Philipp Thomas
1999-04-27 13:06 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
1999-04-27 13:33 ` Philipp Thomas
1999-04-28 0:46 ` Steinar Bang
1999-04-28 5:37 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
1999-04-28 6:05 ` craig
1999-04-28 6:47 ` alex.buell
1999-04-28 6:53 ` craig
1999-04-28 7:17 ` alex.buell
1999-04-28 15:41 ` Martin v. Loewis
1999-04-28 15:46 ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-28 23:16 ` Martin v. Loewis
1999-04-28 23:25 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis [this message]
1999-04-28 23:55 ` Joe Buck
1999-04-29 8:00 ` craig
1999-04-29 8:17 ` Joern Rennecke
1999-04-30 12:40 ` Philipp Thomas
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Philipp Thomas
1999-05-05 1:43 ` Steinar Bang
1999-05-31 21:36 ` Steinar Bang
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Joern Rennecke
1999-04-30 23:15 ` craig
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Joe Buck
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
1999-04-29 13:19 ` Richard Henderson
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Richard Henderson
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Martin v. Loewis
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Martin v. Loewis
1999-04-30 23:15 ` alex.buell
1999-04-30 23:15 ` craig
1999-04-30 23:15 ` alex.buell
1999-04-28 6:54 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
1999-04-30 23:15 ` craig
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Steinar Bang
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Philipp Thomas
1999-04-27 22:24 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
1999-04-30 0:27 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 2:22 ` Andreas Schwab
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Andreas Schwab
1999-04-30 15:06 ` Philipp Thomas
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Philipp Thomas
1999-05-04 0:33 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-05-31 21:36 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-07-09 2:56 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-07-31 23:33 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Philipp Thomas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-04-28 9:17 Mike Stump
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Mike Stump
1999-04-05 17:27 Mike Stump
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Mike Stump
1999-03-25 3:43 Philipp Thomas
1999-03-31 23:46 ` Philipp Thomas
1999-04-03 21:29 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-04 18:00 ` Philipp Thomas
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Philipp Thomas
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Jeffrey A Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xaj3e1kndsf.fsf@korrigan.inria.fr \
--to=gabriel.dos_reis@sophia.inria.fr \
--cc=egcs@egcs.cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).