From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Alexader V. Voinov" <avv@quasar.ipa.nw.ru>
To: egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: why does g77 build?
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 23:15:00 -0000
Message-ID: <37189397.3280666B@quasar.ipa.nw.ru>
X-SW-Source: 1999-04n/msg00595.html
Message-ID: <19990430231500.Lo_DhMNW3u5BzQjso9GaByriA5Q82N3b5ZMcedJLRXY@z>

Alex Buell <alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> On 17 Apr 1999 craig@jcb-sc.com wrote:
>
> > >When I returned to my screen I noticed that g77 was being built.
> > >I didn't want to build g77.  The only compilers I want are the
> > >C and C++ ones.
> >
> > Use the LANGUAGES macro instead.  I hope we fix, if we haven't
> > already, --enable-languages for egcs 1.2, though....
>
> Tee-hee. Another one bitten by this (I got bit by this one 2 days
ago!).
> Yes, please do fix it for 1.2 so we can just enable the bits we want.
I
> think this system of doing things like this is MUCH more convienent
and
> easier to memorize.

Please fix also unnecessary build of 'libf2c' when no 'f77' in
LANGUAGES is specified. I caught it when built a crosscompiler for
i386-*-vxworks target.
(The problem was that for libf2c 'configure' failed at some point, but
that's another story...)

Alexander