public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Henderson <rth@cygnus.com>
To: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin@mira.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de>,
	zack@rabi.columbia.edu
Cc: craig@jcb-sc.com, alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk, egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: i18n of egcs
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 23:15:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19990429131841.A4270@cygnus.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <19990430231500.P3x0whqsUG0ceVQQ9oag0B_3pp9V5_HbLLQ5LOiKXMs@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199904290610.IAA00481@mira.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de>

On Thu, Apr 29, 1999 at 08:10:42AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> > What was wrong with -std=c89 or -std=iso9899:1990 ?
> 
> Nothing. I just question whether an -iso option is still justified, in
> the presence of these options.

I would really really prefer that we didn't add an `-iso' option.

The specs are quite ugly enough already having to handle `-ansi'
in addition to `-std=[!gnu]'.  I'd kill the `-ansi' option entirely
if I thought we could get away with it.


r~

  parent reply	other threads:[~1999-04-30 23:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-04-27 11:43 Philipp Thomas
1999-04-27 13:06 ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
1999-04-27 13:33   ` Philipp Thomas
1999-04-28  0:46     ` Steinar Bang
1999-04-28  5:37       ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
1999-04-30 23:15         ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
1999-04-28  6:05       ` craig
1999-04-28  6:47         ` alex.buell
1999-04-28  6:53           ` craig
1999-04-28  7:17             ` alex.buell
1999-04-28 15:41               ` Martin v. Loewis
1999-04-28 15:46                 ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-28 23:16                   ` Martin v. Loewis
1999-04-28 23:25                     ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
1999-04-28 23:55                       ` Joe Buck
1999-04-29  8:00                         ` craig
1999-04-29  8:17                           ` Joern Rennecke
1999-04-30 12:40                             ` Philipp Thomas
1999-04-30 23:15                               ` Philipp Thomas
1999-05-05  1:43                               ` Steinar Bang
1999-05-31 21:36                                 ` Steinar Bang
1999-04-30 23:15                             ` Joern Rennecke
1999-04-30 23:15                           ` craig
1999-04-30 23:15                         ` Joe Buck
1999-04-30 23:15                       ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
1999-04-29 13:19                     ` Richard Henderson [this message]
1999-04-30 23:15                       ` Richard Henderson
1999-04-30 23:15                     ` Martin v. Loewis
1999-04-30 23:15                   ` Zack Weinberg
1999-04-30 23:15                 ` Martin v. Loewis
1999-04-30 23:15               ` alex.buell
1999-04-30 23:15             ` craig
1999-04-30 23:15           ` alex.buell
1999-04-28  6:54         ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
1999-04-30 23:15           ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
1999-04-30 23:15         ` craig
1999-04-30 23:15       ` Steinar Bang
1999-04-30 23:15     ` Philipp Thomas
1999-04-27 22:24   ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15     ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15   ` Gabriel Dos_Reis
1999-04-30  0:27 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30  2:22   ` Andreas Schwab
1999-04-30 23:15     ` Andreas Schwab
1999-04-30 15:06   ` Philipp Thomas
1999-04-30 23:15     ` Philipp Thomas
1999-05-04  0:33     ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-05-31 21:36       ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-07-09  2:56     ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-07-31 23:33       ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15   ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Philipp Thomas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-04-28  9:17 Mike Stump
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Mike Stump
1999-04-05 17:27 Mike Stump
1999-04-30 23:15 ` Mike Stump
1999-03-25  3:43 Philipp Thomas
1999-03-31 23:46 ` Philipp Thomas
1999-04-03 21:29 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-04-04 18:00   ` Philipp Thomas
1999-04-30 23:15     ` Philipp Thomas
1999-04-30 23:15   ` Jeffrey A Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19990429131841.A4270@cygnus.com \
    --to=rth@cygnus.com \
    --cc=alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk \
    --cc=craig@jcb-sc.com \
    --cc=egcs@cygnus.com \
    --cc=martin@mira.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de \
    --cc=zack@rabi.columbia.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).