From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Manush Dodunekov <manush@litecom.se>
To: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@dcc.unicamp.br>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: possible bug
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 23:33:00 -0000
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907271221020.7382-100000@pulse.litecom.net>
References: <orwvvnpa4u.fsf@cacau.lsd.dcc.unicamp.br>
X-SW-Source: 1999-07n/msg00954.html
Message-ID: <19990731233300.AQ5OX0lnyV-hpwMmzHYu5RbiWxzAOzUoeC_wQItXYac@z>

On 26 Jul 1999, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

> On Jul 25, 1999, Manush Dodunekov <manush@litecom.se> wrote:
> 
> > The code below compiles fine with no flags, but fails to compile with a
> > parse error on the line containing "iterator i;" when compiling with
> > -pedantic.
> 
> That's correct.  Members of template-dependent base classes must be
> explicitly qualified.  Without -pedantic, gcc accepts it as an
> extension.

However, using 
	vector<T>::iterator i;
doesn't help the compile; It only compiles when using 
	typename vector<T>::iterator i;
What does the standard say on this? Shouldn't the first case be enough?

regards,
Manush