gperf F option?

gperf F option?

[korbb]

While building gcc (egcs):

[[...]]
ln cccp cpp
gperf -L C -F ', 0, 0' -p -j1 -i 1 -g -o -t -G -N is_reserved_word \
   -k1,3,$ ../../egcs/gcc/c-parse.gperf >tmp-gperf.h
gperf: invalid option -- F
Usage: gperf [-cCdDef[num]GhH<hashname>i<init>Ijk<keys>K<keyname>lL<language>nN<function name>ors<size>S<switches>tTvW<wordlistname>Z<class name>7] [input-file]
Try `gperf --help' for more information.
make[1]: *** [../../egcs/gcc/c-gperf.h] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/bkorb/tools/egcs/main/=build/gcc'
make: *** [all-gcc] Error 2
/home/bkorb/tools/egcs/main/=build
$ gperf --version
GNU gperf 2.7

Re: gperf F option?

[Brian Ford]

On Tue, 31 Aug 1999 korbb@egcs.cygnus.com wrote:

> While building gcc (egcs):
> 
> [[...]]
> gperf -L C -F ', 0, 0' -p -j1 -i 1 -g -o -t -G -N is_reserved_word \
>    -k1,3,$ ../../egcs/gcc/c-parse.gperf >tmp-gperf.h
> gperf: invalid option -- F
> Usage: gperf [-cCdDef[num]GhH<hashname>i<init>Ijk<keys>K<keyname>lL<language>nN<function name>ors<size>S<switches>tTvW<wordlistname>Z<class name>7] [input-file]
> Try `gperf --help' for more information.
> $ gperf --version
> GNU gperf 2.7
> 

http://egcs.cygnus.com/faq.html#gperf

--
Brian Ford
Software Engineer
Vital Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax:   314-551-8444

Re: gperf F option?

[Brian Ford]

On Tue, 31 Aug 1999 korbb@egcs.cygnus.com wrote:

> While building gcc (egcs):
> 
> [[...]]
> gperf -L C -F ', 0, 0' -p -j1 -i 1 -g -o -t -G -N is_reserved_word \
>    -k1,3,$ ../../egcs/gcc/c-parse.gperf >tmp-gperf.h
> gperf: invalid option -- F
> Usage: gperf [-cCdDef[num]GhH<hashname>i<init>Ijk<keys>K<keyname>lL<language>nN<function name>ors<size>S<switches>tTvW<wordlistname>Z<class name>7] [input-file]
> Try `gperf --help' for more information.
> $ gperf --version
> GNU gperf 2.7
> 

http://egcs.cygnus.com/faq.html#gperf

--
Brian Ford
Software Engineer
Vital Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax:   314-551-8444

Re: gperf F option?

[David O'Brien]

On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 11:21:24AM -0500, Brian Ford wrote:
> http://egcs.cygnus.com/faq.html#gperf

Is there some reason a new version of gperf cannot be released with this
functionality?

-- 
-- David    (obrien@NUXI.com)

Re: gperf F option?

[Alexandre Oliva]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 676 bytes --]

On May 26, 2000, "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 11:21:24AM -0500, Brian Ford wrote:
>> http://egcs.cygnus.com/faq.html#gperf

> Is there some reason a new version of gperf cannot be released with this
> functionality?

You may try to convince the maintainer of gperf to make a new release.
But I'm not even sure gperf has a maintainer these days.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva    Enjoy Guaraná, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company        aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com
Free Software Developer and Evangelist    CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}   Write to mailing lists, not to me

Re: gperf F option?

[David O'Brien]

On Sat, May 27, 2000 at 05:47:03PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On May 26, 2000, "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> wrote:
>> http://egcs.cygnus.com/faq.html#gperf
> > Is there some reason a new version of gperf cannot be released with this
> > functionality?
> 
> You may try to convince the maintainer of gperf to make a new release.
> But I'm not even sure gperf has a maintainer these days.
 
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999 11:17:36 -0500 (CDT), Ossama Othman
<othman@cs.wustl.edu> queried egcs@egcs.cygnus.com about Gperf
maintainership in <199904261619.LAA29202@taumsauk.cs.wustl.edu>.  On Thu,
29 Apr 1999 01:51:13 +0200 (MET DST) Bruno Haible <haible@ilog.fr> in
<199904282351.BAA15346@jaures.ilog.fr> claimed he was.  Has this elapsed?

-- 
-- David    (obrien@NUXI.com)

Re: gperf F option?

[Alexandre Oliva]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 497 bytes --]

On May 27, 2000, "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> wrote:

> Bruno Haible <haible@ilog.fr> in
> <199904282351.BAA15346@jaures.ilog.fr> claimed he was.  Has this
> elapsed?

No, I had just forgot about it.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva    Enjoy Guaraná, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company        aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com
Free Software Developer and Evangelist    CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}   Write to mailing lists, not to me

Re: gperf F option?

[David Edelsohn]

	You are not using a new enough version of gperf.

David

Re: gperf F option?

[David Edelsohn]

	You are not using a new enough version of gperf.

David

Re: gperf F option?

[Dean Wilson]

On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, you wrote:
> While building gcc (egcs):
> 
> [[...]]
> ln cccp cpp
> gperf -L C -F ', 0, 0' -p -j1 -i 1 -g -o -t -G -N is_reserved_word \
>    -k1,3,$ ../../egcs/gcc/c-parse.gperf >tmp-gperf.h
> gperf: invalid option -- F
> Usage: gperf [-cCdDef[num]GhH<hashname>i<init>Ijk<keys>K<keyname>lL<language>nN<function name>ors<size>S<switches>tTvW<wordlistname>Z<class name>7] [input-file]
> Try `gperf --help' for more information.
> make[1]: *** [../../egcs/gcc/c-gperf.h] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/bkorb/tools/egcs/main/=build/gcc'
> make: *** [all-gcc] Error 2
> /home/bkorb/tools/egcs/main/=build
> $ gperf --version
> GNU gperf 2.7


take look at the faq, there is a patch for gperf in /pub/egcs/infrastructure at
sourceware, that deals with this issue.

Re: gperf F option?

[Dean Wilson]

On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, you wrote:
> While building gcc (egcs):
> 
> [[...]]
> ln cccp cpp
> gperf -L C -F ', 0, 0' -p -j1 -i 1 -g -o -t -G -N is_reserved_word \
>    -k1,3,$ ../../egcs/gcc/c-parse.gperf >tmp-gperf.h
> gperf: invalid option -- F
> Usage: gperf [-cCdDef[num]GhH<hashname>i<init>Ijk<keys>K<keyname>lL<language>nN<function name>ors<size>S<switches>tTvW<wordlistname>Z<class name>7] [input-file]
> Try `gperf --help' for more information.
> make[1]: *** [../../egcs/gcc/c-gperf.h] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/bkorb/tools/egcs/main/=build/gcc'
> make: *** [all-gcc] Error 2
> /home/bkorb/tools/egcs/main/=build
> $ gperf --version
> GNU gperf 2.7


take look at the faq, there is a patch for gperf in /pub/egcs/infrastructure at
sourceware, that deals with this issue.

gperf F option?

[korbb]

While building gcc (egcs):

[[...]]
ln cccp cpp
gperf -L C -F ', 0, 0' -p -j1 -i 1 -g -o -t -G -N is_reserved_word \
   -k1,3,$ ../../egcs/gcc/c-parse.gperf >tmp-gperf.h
gperf: invalid option -- F
Usage: gperf [-cCdDef[num]GhH<hashname>i<init>Ijk<keys>K<keyname>lL<language>nN<function name>ors<size>S<switches>tTvW<wordlistname>Z<class name>7] [input-file]
Try `gperf --help' for more information.
make[1]: *** [../../egcs/gcc/c-gperf.h] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/bkorb/tools/egcs/main/=build/gcc'
make: *** [all-gcc] Error 2
/home/bkorb/tools/egcs/main/=build
$ gperf --version
GNU gperf 2.7

Re: gperf F option?

[Desmond Cheung]

>You don't need gperf at all, unless you're modifying source files that
>are processed with gperf.  Use `contrib/gcc_udpate --touch' if you
>just want to adjust the timestamps.

I tried to build a cross-compiler and received the following error during the make process:
.
.
.
cd .; bison  -d -o parse.c parse.y
parse.y contains 30 shift/reduce conflicts and 42 reduce/reduce conflicts.
cd .; grep '^#define[   ]*YYEMPTY' parse.c >>parse.h
cd ./objc; \
bison  -o objc-parse.c objc-parse.y
objc-parse.y contains 72 shift/reduce conflicts.
gperf -L C -F ', 0, 0' -p -j1 -i 1 -g -o -t -G -N is_reserved_word \
   -k1,3,$ ./c-parse.gperf >tmp-gperf.h
gperf: unrecognized option `-F'
Usage: gperf [-acCdDef[num]gGhH<hashname>i<init>jk<keys>K<keyname>lL<language>nN<function name>oprs<size>S<switches>tTvZ<class name>].
(type gperf -h for help)
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `c-gperf.h'
Current working directory /net/local-kirin/gnudev/gnu/m68k/gcc-2.95.2/gcc
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `cross'

Des

Re: gperf F option?

[Alexandre Oliva]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 672 bytes --]

On May 29, 2000, Desmond Cheung <dycheung@cs.sfu.ca> wrote:

>> You don't need gperf at all, unless you're modifying source files that
>> are processed with gperf.  Use `contrib/gcc_udpate --touch' if you
>> just want to adjust the timestamps.

> I tried to build a cross-compiler and received the following error
> during the make process:

This means your timestamps got wrong.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva    Enjoy Guaraná, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company        aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com
Free Software Developer and Evangelist    CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}   Write to mailing lists, not to me

Re: gperf F option?

[Desmond Cheung]

Hi,

is there an alternative to patching gperf since I don't have the authority to do so.

Thanks

Desmond

Re: gperf F option?

[Alexandre Oliva]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 617 bytes --]

On May 29, 2000, Desmond Cheung <dycheung@cs.sfu.ca> wrote:

> is there an alternative to patching gperf since I don't have the
> authority to do so.

You don't need gperf at all, unless you're modifying source files that
are processed with gperf.  Use `contrib/gcc_udpate --touch' if you
just want to adjust the timestamps.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva    Enjoy Guaraná, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company        aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com
Free Software Developer and Evangelist    CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}   Write to mailing lists, not to me

gperf F option?

[korbb]

gperf F option?

[korbb]