From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Richard Henderson <rth AT cygnus.com>
To: Mike Stump <mrs AT wrs.com>
Cc: gcc AT gcc.gnu.org, rainer.dorsch AT informatik.uni-stuttgart.de
Subject: Re: Optimization for PII
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 21:02:00 -0000
Message-id: <19990913210204.A31604@cygnus.com>
References: <199909140020.RAA23613@kankakee.wrs.com>
X-SW-Source: 1999-09/msg00516.html

On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 05:20:50PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> I think we could add PII and PIII as essentially aliases to pentiumpro
> for users that don't know much about the CPU line.

I thought about this.  It starts to make the specs file extremely ugly.
Just documenting things properly is probably good enough?



r~

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Richard Henderson <rth@cygnus.com>
To: Mike Stump <mrs@wrs.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, rainer.dorsch@informatik.uni-stuttgart.de
Subject: Re: Optimization for PII
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 18:02:00 -0000
Message-ID: <19990913210204.A31604@cygnus.com>
References: <199909140020.RAA23613@kankakee.wrs.com>
X-SW-Source: 1999-09n/msg00516.html
Message-ID: <19990930180200._kxnIwsqlKah3hlZVpuw4lUmv7nF7mYVD5OKmEzAMoM@z>

On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 05:20:50PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> I think we could add PII and PIII as essentially aliases to pentiumpro
> for users that don't know much about the CPU line.

I thought about this.  It starts to make the specs file extremely ugly.
Just documenting things properly is probably good enough?



r~