From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack@bitmover.com>
Cc: obrien@NUXI.com, rittle@rsch.comm.mot.com, morganw@engr.sc.edu, rth@cygnus.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.0 
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 18:02:00 -0000
Message-ID: <1934.937846286@upchuck.cygnus.com>
References: <199909201624.JAA16030@zack.bitmover.com>
X-SW-Source: 1999-09n/msg00840.html
Message-ID: <19990930180200.O2M_LwcvFBlchtkNhSW-X24hdX-quYYXfGLHi6X9wcY@z>

  In message < 199909201624.JAA16030@zack.bitmover.com >you write:
  > Jeffrey A Law wrote:
  > >   In message < 19990915011710.B25121@relay.nuxi.com >you write:
  > >   > There are no GCC headers in my base system.  We've never needed them,
  >  and
  > >   > there are copyright issues anyway.
  > > What copyright issues?
  > 
  > There is no explicit license/copyright statement at the top of
  > stddef.h or stdarg.h or whatever.  Someone could easily have been
  > misled into thinking that they were GPLed and would infect programs.
  > 
  > We should probably put something like the libstdc++ "special
  > exception" paragraph at the top.
Sigh.  There are times when the laxness of the previous 10 years really
bugs me.  This is one of them.

Start with the template in libgcc2.c and change it to deal with header
files instead of libraries.

Do you want to do this, or should I (or if someone else wants it, speak up).


jeff