From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31169 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2003 09:01:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31160 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2003 09:01:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ngate.noida.hcltech.com) (202.54.110.230) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2003 09:01:34 -0000 Received: from exch-01.noida.hcltech.com (exch-01 [204.160.254.29]) by ngate.noida.hcltech.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBB9e9wa031260; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:10:12 +0530 Received: by exch-01.noida.hcltech.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:33:40 +0530 Message-ID: <1B3885BC15C7024C845AAC78314766C50184C614@exch-01.noida.hcltech.com> From: "Naveen Sharma, Noida" To: Umar Janjua Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Sanjiv Gupta Subject: Re: Register Spilling Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:11:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00649.txt.bz2 > > There have been some proposals to sort them, offhand I > don't know if there are patches available anywhere for this. > > -- > > Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com > > > > > One of them is > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-01/msg00019.html This was the last post. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-01/msg02567.html Do let me know if you are interesred to use this. This has not been checked in the mainline. For patches like this to go into mainline, they should be tested for atleast 5 gcc targets. I couldn't do that. But I can help, if you are interested. Best Regards, Naveen Sharma.