* re: subscripted value is neither array nor pointer
@ 2000-03-13 0:47 Peter Jordan
2000-03-13 1:04 ` Alexandre Oliva
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Jordan @ 2000-03-13 0:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc; +Cc: gcc-bugs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2195 bytes --]
>> t-> osd2.linux2.l_i_reserved2[0] =
>Take a look at the preprocessed code first, it may turn out to be some
>preprocessing issue, such as the wrong header file getting included or
>something.
Urk. I thought it might have been a known "change" and not a bug.
Here goes ...
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/2.96/specs
gcc version 2.96 20000306 (experimental)
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/2.96/cpp -lang-c -v -I../../lib -I../../lib -D__GNUC__=2 -D__GNUC_MINOR__=96 -D__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__=0 -D__ELF__ -Dunix -Dlinux -D__ELF__ -D__unix__ -D__linux__ -D__unix -D__linux -Asystem(posix) -D__OPTIMIZE__ -g -Acpu(i386) -Amachine(i386) -Di386 -D__i386 -D__i386__ -D__tune_pentiumpro__ -DHAVE_LINUX_FS_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_STDARG_H=1 -DHAVE_ERRNO_H=1 -DHAVE_MALLOC_H=1 -DHAVE_MNTENT_H=1 -DHAVE_PATHS_H=1 -DHAVE_DIRENT_H=1 -DHAVE_GETOPT_H=1 -DHAVE_SETJMP_H=1 -DHAVE_SIGNAL_H=1 -DHAVE_TERMIOS_H=1 -DHAVE_LINUX_FD_H=1 -DHAVE_LINUX_MAJOR_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_NET_IF_H=1 -DHAVE_NETINET_IN_H=1 -DHAVE_VPRINTF=1 -DSIZEOF_SHORT=2 -DSIZEOF_INT=4 -DSIZEOF_LONG=4 -DSIZEOF_LONG_LONG=8 -DHAVE_GETRUSAGE=1 -DHAVE_LLSEEK=1 -DHAVE_STRDUP=1 -DHAVE_STRCASECMP=1 -DHAVE_SRANDOM=1 -DHAVE_FCHOWN=1 -DHAVE_MALLINFO=1 -DHAVE_INO_T=1 -DHAVE_EXT2_IOCTLS=1 swapfs.c swapfs.i
GNU CPP version 2.96 20000306 (experimental) (cpplib)
(i386 Linux/ELF)
ignoring duplicate directory `../../lib'
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
../../lib
/usr/local/include
/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/2.96/include
/usr/include
End of search list.
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/2.96/cc1 swapfs.i -quiet -dumpbase swapfs.c -g -O2 -version -o swapfs.s
GNU C version 2.96 20000306 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu) compiled by GNU C version 2.96 20000306 (experimental).
swapfs.c: In function `ext2fs_swap_inode':
swapfs.c:119: subscripted value is neither array nor pointer
swapfs.c:120: subscripted value is neither array nor pointer
swapfs.c:121: subscripted value is neither array nor pointer
swapfs.c:122: subscripted value is neither array nor pointer
[-- Attachment #2: swapfs.i.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 15466 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: subscripted value is neither array nor pointer
2000-03-13 0:47 subscripted value is neither array nor pointer Peter Jordan
@ 2000-03-13 1:04 ` Alexandre Oliva
2000-03-13 2:28 ` subscripted value is neither array nor pointer(close?) PJ
2000-03-13 2:50 ` subscripted value (../../lib vs. ../../../lib explained) PJ
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Oliva @ 2000-03-13 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Jordan; +Cc: Zack Weinberg
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1349 bytes --]
On Mar 13, 2000, Peter Jordan <pjordan@noname.blackwire.com> wrote:
t-> osd2.linux2.l_i_reserved2[0] =
>> Take a look at the preprocessed code first, it may turn out to be some
>> preprocessing issue, such as the wrong header file getting included or
>> something.
> Urk. I thought it might have been a known "change" and not a bug.
May be, we never know. That's why it always helps to have as much
information as possible.
In the preprocessed code you posted, you'll find:
# 19 "/usr/include/linux/ext2_fs.h" 2 3
[snip]
struct ext2_inode {
[snip]
__u32 l_i_reserved2;
} linux2;
Note, it is not an array, because it comes from
/usr/include/linux/ext2_fs.h, not from .../lib/ext2_fs.h. And there's
something else intriguing me:
> /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/2.96/cpp -lang-c -v -I../../lib -I../../lib [...]
> ignoring duplicate directory `../../lib'
However, the original command line said: -I../../lib -I../../../lib
Can you confirm that the GCC snapshot is indeed modifying the second
-I flag?
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Enjoy Guaraná
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com
Free Software Developer and Evangelist CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Write to mailing lists, not to me
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: subscripted value is neither array nor pointer(close?)
2000-03-13 1:04 ` Alexandre Oliva
@ 2000-03-13 2:28 ` PJ
2000-03-13 4:21 ` tytso
2000-03-13 2:50 ` subscripted value (../../lib vs. ../../../lib explained) PJ
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: PJ @ 2000-03-13 2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc, gcc-bugs; +Cc: tytso
> # 19 "/usr/include/linux/ext2_fs.h" 2 3
> [snip]
> struct ext2_inode {
> [snip]
> __u32 l_i_reserved2;
> } linux2;
Thanks. I am learning.
> Note, it is not an array, because it comes from
> /usr/include/linux/ext2_fs.h, not from .../lib/ext2_fs.h. And there's
> something else intriguing me:
There is no ../../lib/ext2_fs.h ! There is a
../../include/linux/ext2_fs.h though, but that is not in the search
path. THe latter also defines:
__u32 l_i_reserved2[2];
Furthermore the linux kernel source for 2.2.14 has
in include/linux/ext2_fs.h
__u32 l_i_reserved2[2];
BUT
the source tree for 2.3.49 has
__u16 l_i_uid_high; /* these 2 fields */
__u16 l_i_gid_high; /* were reserved2[0] */
__u32 l_i_reserved2;
So. I guess I should either get rid of that 2.3.49 source tree,
(haven't booted it yet) or fix the search path.
> > ignoring duplicate directory `../../lib'
> However, the original command line said: -I../../lib -I../../../lib
> Can you confirm that the GCC snapshot is indeed modifying the second
> -I flag?
Nope. I looked again at my post and it shows both as -I../../lib,
with no -I../../../lib
Thanks very much for your help.
Peter (who once upon a time lived in Campina Grande long ago)
--
pjordan at blackwire.com 323-665-0893 Black Wire Media
"The meaning of a value is determined by how it is used" : Ousterhout
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: subscripted value (../../lib vs. ../../../lib explained)
2000-03-13 1:04 ` Alexandre Oliva
2000-03-13 2:28 ` subscripted value is neither array nor pointer(close?) PJ
@ 2000-03-13 2:50 ` PJ
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: PJ @ 2000-03-13 2:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 600 bytes --]
> However, the original command line said: -I../../lib -I../../../lib
> Can you confirm that the GCC snapshot is indeed modifying the second
> -I flag?
> --
> Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Enjoy Guaraná
Oops.
I've been jumping around directories too much. The -I../../../lib
came from when I did it the right way in a build subdir.
They are both ../../lib when I failed to do it(./configure, make) that way.
Thanks again.
Peter
--
pjordan at blackwire.com 323-665-0893 Black Wire Media
"The meaning of a value is determined by how it is used" : Ousterhout
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: subscripted value is neither array nor pointer(close?)
2000-03-13 2:28 ` subscripted value is neither array nor pointer(close?) PJ
@ 2000-03-13 4:21 ` tytso
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: tytso @ 2000-03-13 4:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pjordan; +Cc: gcc, gcc-bugs
This is fixed in e2fsprogs 1.19-WIP. You can get it from
http://e2fsprogs.sourceforge.net
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-03-13 4:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-03-13 0:47 subscripted value is neither array nor pointer Peter Jordan
2000-03-13 1:04 ` Alexandre Oliva
2000-03-13 2:28 ` subscripted value is neither array nor pointer(close?) PJ
2000-03-13 4:21 ` tytso
2000-03-13 2:50 ` subscripted value (../../lib vs. ../../../lib explained) PJ
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).