From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de>
To: bosch@gnat.com
Cc: haible@ilog.fr, rth@cygnus.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: tail call optimization vs. debugging
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 12:54:00 -0000
Message-id: <200003252050.VAA26012@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de>
References: <20000325171727.D8EFD34D80@nile.gnat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2000-03/msg00676.html

> One of the main things that IMO needs to be preserved, even when it
> would mean loosing some optimizations at -O2, is being able to
> reliably breakpoint on functions and get useful stack tracebacks
> with arguments.

Does this mean you don't want the compiler to support the inline
keyword? Because with inlining, you cannot set a break-point on an
inlined function, and get a useful stack backtrace with arguments
right now.

Martin