public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Stump <mrs@windriver.com>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, geoffk@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: new automated testing facility now operational
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:57:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200003302357.PAA11988@kankakee.wrs.com> (raw)

Way cool.

Yeah, I've thought we've needed it for 5 years now.  Next one will be
a, after much testing of nominated changes across lots of targets, the
code gets migrated to the next release branch.  You want your code in
the release, you have to pass the test, then, the _system_ puts it in.
Code that fails testing, is automatically moved to a side branch to
allow other code being put in to pass it up.  The more junk that goes
in, the more that is derailed to a side branch.  If nice code goes in,
the system pats you on the back by arranging for it to go into the
release branch.

Need a well tested snapshot, but don't want to be burned, use the
release branch.  Like helping others, cleap up the stuff on the side
branch.

Now, lots of us folks have spare disk and spare cycles.  Might be nice
if you pass dated cvs command lines to others that you otherwise
believe will work, (since you have nice bandwidth into the server),
and have them bash on them to increase coverage.  I'm thinking about
extending the automated stuff out, not doing any of this by hand.

I know I have a complete target lab with about 56 boards in it (28
totally free at the moment), all with ethernet, APC power control for
dejagnu and so on, across 9 major CPU families.  Certainly I have to
already support these whee beasties.  And it benefits me if problems
are found before I `get' to the software.  Ah, in time.

Anyway, talk and toughts are cheap.  Your actions are awesome and much
harder, thanks.

             reply	other threads:[~2000-03-30 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-03-30 15:57 Mike Stump [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-03-30 15:01 Geoff Keating
2000-03-30 15:57 ` Alexandre Oliva
2000-03-30 16:30   ` Geoff Keating
2000-03-30 16:59     ` Alexandre Oliva
2000-03-30 17:29       ` Geoff Keating
2000-03-31  9:33         ` Jeffrey A Law
2000-03-30 17:01     ` Michael Meissner
2000-04-02 15:59 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2000-04-02 16:17   ` Geoff Keating

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200003302357.PAA11988@kankakee.wrs.com \
    --to=mrs@windriver.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=geoffk@cygnus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).