* -march= for x86
@ 2000-06-09 15:09 tmwg-gcc
2000-06-09 15:41 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: tmwg-gcc @ 2000-06-09 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
I understood from the docs that -march=i686 automatically supplied
-mcpu=i686 as well. Yet I see examples of people using both of them on the
command line at the same time (redundantly if I understood correctly).
Did I read wrong?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: -march= for x86
2000-06-09 15:09 -march= for x86 tmwg-gcc
@ 2000-06-09 15:41 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2000-06-09 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tmwg-gcc; +Cc: gcc
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 03:07:57PM -0700, tmwg-gcc@inxservices.com wrote:
> I understood from the docs that -march=i686 automatically supplied
> -mcpu=i686 as well. Yet I see examples of people using both of them on the
> command line at the same time (redundantly if I understood correctly).
> Did I read wrong?
No, you read correctly. Folks are using redundant arguments.
r~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-06-09 15:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-06-09 15:09 -march= for x86 tmwg-gcc
2000-06-09 15:41 ` Richard Henderson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).