From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Mitchell To: kettenis@wins.uva.nl Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: GCC's statement expression extension Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2000 09:06:00 -0000 Message-id: <20000804090648N.mitchell@codesourcery.com> References: <200008041239.e74Cd1s27445@debye.wins.uva.nl> X-SW-Source: 2000-08/msg00112.html >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Kettenis writes: Mark> From: Jamie Lokier Date: Mark> Fri, 4 Aug 2000 13:35:25 +0200 Mark> [Mark: the toupper example is not correct] Oh, I see -- you're saying we use inlines instead. Mark> Mark, please make sure that what you're saying about glibc Mark> in the documentation is accurate. Feel free to keep the Mark> comment if you can find a *real* example where the semantics Mark> are problematic. Otherwise, replace the reference to the Mark> GNU C Library with a concrete example of a statement Mark> expression that has problems. Fair enough. I originally discovered this problem in real code using glibc. It may well be that some of the problems have been fixed since then. I will vaguify the documentation appropriately. -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com