* Re: Problem with alpha.c:print_operand
@ 2000-09-17 13:59 Richard Kenner
2000-09-17 14:24 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Kenner @ 2000-09-17 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rth; +Cc: gcc
The .vtable bits are going to fail on Alpha no matter what.
You're just looking at the tip of the iceberg there. The
way they were implemented is a complete hack, and I'm sorry
I never went back in to clean it up.
Nevertheless, don't you think it's a bad idea to use the same 'c' code
that final.c has builtin?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Problem with alpha.c:print_operand
2000-09-17 13:59 Problem with alpha.c:print_operand Richard Kenner
@ 2000-09-17 14:24 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2000-09-17 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Kenner; +Cc: gcc
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 04:59:40PM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote:
> Nevertheless, don't you think it's a bad idea to use the same 'c' code
> that final.c has builtin?
*shrug* For the cases it's used for (comparisons) we always go
through the output_operand path, which does exactly what we want.
You wrote that yourself ages and ages ago.
r~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Problem with alpha.c:print_operand
@ 2000-09-17 14:43 Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2000-09-17 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 05:38:23PM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote:
> *shrug* For the cases it's used for (comparisons) we always go
> through the output_operand path, which does exactly what we want.
>
> True, but I still don't like it.
So pick another upper/lower letter pair. Perhaps G/g.
Not nearly as satisfying as C/c for "comparison", but
still functional.
r~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Problem with alpha.c:print_operand
@ 2000-09-17 14:39 Richard Kenner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Kenner @ 2000-09-17 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rth; +Cc: gcc
*shrug* For the cases it's used for (comparisons) we always go
through the output_operand path, which does exactly what we want.
True, but I still don't like it.
You wrote that yourself ages and ages ago.
I know. I did some checking to see if I really did that at the time
that final.c also had a 'c'. I can't believe I did, but I also can't
find any evidence that it was added later.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Problem with alpha.c:print_operand
2000-09-17 7:11 Richard Kenner
@ 2000-09-17 12:53 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2000-09-17 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Kenner; +Cc: gcc
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 10:11:15AM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote:
> It redefines code 'c', which is known to final.c. This cause problems
> with a .vtable asm used by g++ and causes g++.other/crash18.C to fail
> on Alpha.
The .vtable bits are going to fail on Alpha no matter what.
You're just looking at the tip of the iceberg there. The
way they were implemented is a complete hack, and I'm sorry
I never went back in to clean it up.
> Is anybody running "make check" on Alpha?
Of course. I've just been ignoring some tests. Mostly those
that also fail on other targets.
r~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Problem with alpha.c:print_operand
@ 2000-09-17 7:11 Richard Kenner
2000-09-17 12:53 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Richard Kenner @ 2000-09-17 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
It redefines code 'c', which is known to final.c. This cause problems
with a .vtable asm used by g++ and causes g++.other/crash18.C to fail
on Alpha.
Is anybody running "make check" on Alpha?
I did to test out my changes and got numerous errors, all unrelated to
what I changed!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-09-17 14:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-09-17 13:59 Problem with alpha.c:print_operand Richard Kenner
2000-09-17 14:24 ` Richard Henderson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-09-17 14:43 Richard Henderson
2000-09-17 14:39 Richard Kenner
2000-09-17 7:11 Richard Kenner
2000-09-17 12:53 ` Richard Henderson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).