From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Brad Lucier <lucier@math.purdue.edu>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, cgd@sibyte.com
Cc: lucier@math.purdue.edu (Brad Lucier)
Subject: Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 20:54:00 -0000
Message-id: <200009220354.WAA14572@polya.math.purdue.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2000-09/msg00521.html

Chris G. Demetriou wrote:

> If there's some bad style that you really want to force people to fix
> (e.g. bad parenthesization) that's one thing, but spurious warnings
> cause by compiler confusion are Really Bad and make many people's
> lives harder.
> 
> (This post, plus something I saw earlier about adding warnings if the
> compiler can't invoke certain optimizations because of complexity,
> made me feel inclined to pipe up about this.)

Well, as the person who proposed the -Wdisabled-optimization
warning, let me say that I'm proposing that it *not* be invoked
by any "group" warning flag like -Wall.  You don't claim that
it is, but readers might (reasonably, but falsely) infer that
from what you wrote.

I'd just like to have this optimization information so I can change the
generated C code I'm handing to gcc if I have to.

Brad Lucier