From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Starner To: Richard Kenner Cc: law@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org Subject: Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 18:09:00 -0000 Message-id: <20001101200846.A28532@x8b4e516e.dhcp.okstate.edu> References: <10011020154.AA05910@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> X-SW-Source: 2000-11/msg00053.html On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 08:54:07PM -0500, Richard Kenner wrote: > Yes, but again, this is only relevent if there *are* a set of "GNU Ada > developers". I don't see any evidence of such a group at this point. > Sure, when the sources are in the GCC tree, it will encourage such, > but I don't expect that to make any difference whatsoever. > > Are you aware of any GNU Ada developers "in the wings" out there? There's always the GNAT for DOS people. -- David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org http://dvdeug.dhis.org If you wish to strive for peace of soul then believe; if you wish to be a devotee of truth, then inquire. -- Friedrich Nietzsche