From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
To: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu, law@redhat.com
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 19:08:00 -0000
Message-id: <20001102030846.5598934DAF@nile.gnat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2000-11/msg00066.html

<<Is it possible that they lost interest because they don't think they're going
even playing field with ACT?
>>

No, we actually work very closely with this group, and they have direct
access to anything they want, the reason being to expedite the release of
the RPM's for a new GNAT release. Like any group of volunteers, the time
they can spend on this goes up and down, it is not a first priority for
any of that group, quite understandably, whereas of course GNAT *is*
a first priority for the 35 or so people working at ACT and ACT/Europe.