From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
To: dewar@gnat.com, law@redhat.com
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu, rms@gnu.org, rth@cygnus.com, shebs@apple.com
Subject: Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 20:27:00 -0000
Message-id: <20001102042753.49CCC34DAF@nile.gnat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2000-11/msg00093.html

<<Why don't you read the GCC 3.0 release criteria?
>>

That does not really address what I was talking about, which is not
establishing some gating release criteria, but rather setting up
continued development procedures and testing regimens that ensure that
performance is *always* being considered. Performance is not an
add-on feature :-)