From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
To: law@redhat.com
Cc: dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org, kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 15:03:00 -0000
Message-id: <200011022259.PAA05369@wijiji.santafe.edu>
References: <14729.973131786@upchuck>
X-SW-Source: 2000-11/msg00172.html

    And the GNAT for Linux folks.

What an ironic name for a project.  When they say "Linux", they must
really mean the GNU/Linux system.  But GNAT itself is supposed to
exist *for* the GNU system (which includes GNU/Linux).

So if there is a need for an outside project to work on GNAT to get it
to work well in GNU/Linux, does that mean the standard GNAT is not
paying enough attention to the system it is part of?