From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) To: dewar@gnat.com, guerby@acm.org Cc: dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu, law@redhat.com, rms@gnu.org Subject: Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 18:21:00 -0000 Message-id: <20001103022115.DCCC134D81@nile.gnat.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-11/msg00185.html <> Interesting, last I asked, this was a small subset that omitted all of tasking (the only part that is even slightly non-trivial in maintaining the port). Laurent, do you know that there is now a tasking 3.13p DOS version? If so that's nice to hear, since for a long time, this was not the case. It is also good to hear that the Linux RPM's are appearing, as I said earlier, when volunteers are at work, other demands on their time can take precedence, and one should not assume that people have lost interest just because you don't see them working away furiously!