From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dewar@gnat.com
To: dewar@gnat.com, egcs@tantalophile.demon.co.uk
Cc: aoliva@redhat.com, denisc@overta.ru, dkorn@pixelpower.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, peter.osterlund@mailbox.swipnet.se
Subject: Re: Bug in loop optimize (invalid postinc to preinc transformation)
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 18:43:00 -0000
Message-id: <20001230024259.36BD134D81@nile.gnat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2000-12/msg00859.html

<<Quite.  There's a pointer constant in the offending code.  It's not in
any array.  Do we offer implementation defined behaviour for numerical
pointer constants or not?  They do come in useful occasionally.
>>

It is hard NOT to offer implementation defined behavior :-)

I think you are asking if we provide easily defined useful behavior??