From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joe Buck <jbuck@racerx.synopsys.com>
To: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au (Fergus Henderson)
Cc: dewar@gnat.com, torvalds@transmeta.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, per@bothner.com
Subject: Re: Trigraph warnings when compiling linux-2.4.0-prerelease1
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 11:21:00 -0000
Message-id: <200101031920.LAA04469@racerx.synopsys.com>
References: <20010103140307.B4402@hg.cs.mu.oz.au>
X-SW-Source: 2001-01/msg00135.html

On 02-Jan-2001, dewar@gnat.com <dewar@gnat.com> wrote:
> > In fact the current documentation is clear and appears to match the
> > documentation.

Fergus Henderson writes:
> I'm not quite sure what you mean there (did you intend to say
> "appears to match the implementation"?).
> 
> The current documentation says
> 
> `-Wtrigraphs'
>      Warn if any trigraphs are encountered that might change the
>      meaning of the program (trigraphs within comments are not warned
>      about).
> 
> which is different to the documentation quoted earlier in this
> thread.  I agree that it seems clear enough.

Linus was talking about the documentation for the most recently
released compiler (the manual shipped with 2.95.2), not the manual
in the snapshots.

(This is just for clarification, I'm not going to continue the argument).