From: dewar@gnat.com
To: bernds@redhat.com, rearnsha@arm.com
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, jbuck@racerx.synopsys.com, per@bothner.com
Subject: Re: Is this a gcc bug?
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010111183831.E084B34D88@nile.gnat.com> (raw)
<<Expression containing 'x' has undefined meaning (more than one
interpretation possible).
>>
I find that wrong enough to be confusing, the problem is not that
there are multiple interpretations, it is that the result is
undefined. You do NOT want to teach people, incorrectly, that
this has non-deterministic (but otherwise defined) semantics,
since that's not what the standard says. The current error
message is better than the above suggestion.
next reply other threads:[~2001-01-11 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-11 10:38 dewar [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-16 13:01 Is this a GCC bug? Bingfeng Mei
2008-06-16 13:33 ` Bingfeng Mei
2001-01-17 23:30 Is this a gcc bug? Axel Kittenberger
2001-01-16 17:06 dewar
2001-01-14 16:14 dewar
2001-01-14 16:53 ` Dave Korn
2001-01-14 5:31 dewar
2001-01-14 15:51 ` Geoff Keating
2001-01-12 19:15 dewar
2001-01-12 19:29 ` Fergus Henderson
2001-01-12 19:14 dewar
2001-01-12 19:36 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-01-12 18:21 dewar
2001-01-12 18:29 ` Joseph S. Myers
2001-01-12 18:49 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-01-12 18:58 ` Fergus Henderson
2001-01-13 10:34 ` James Dennett
2001-01-16 17:01 ` Michael Eager
2001-01-17 3:21 ` Falk Hueffner
2001-01-17 14:57 ` Michael Eager
2001-01-12 1:18 Axel Kittenberger
2001-01-12 18:14 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-01-12 19:11 ` Fergus Henderson
2001-01-13 3:21 ` Richard Earnshaw
2001-01-11 10:30 dewar
2001-01-11 10:05 dewar
2001-01-11 10:00 David Korn
2001-01-11 21:36 ` Andy Walker
2001-01-13 18:45 ` Joern Rennecke
2001-01-14 2:21 ` Geoff Keating
2001-01-11 7:07 dewar
2001-01-11 5:53 dewar
2001-01-11 6:06 ` Bernd Schmidt
2001-01-11 8:40 ` Per Bothner
2001-01-11 9:03 ` Richard Earnshaw
2001-01-11 9:27 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-01-11 9:33 ` Joe Buck
2001-01-11 9:38 ` Bernd Schmidt
2001-01-11 9:44 ` Richard Earnshaw
2001-01-11 10:57 ` Neil Booth
2001-01-11 5:49 dewar
2001-01-11 3:04 David Korn
2001-01-11 2:11 Uros Bizjak
2001-01-11 3:04 ` Alexandre Oliva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010111183831.E084B34D88@nile.gnat.com \
--to=dewar@gnat.com \
--cc=bernds@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jbuck@racerx.synopsys.com \
--cc=per@bothner.com \
--cc=rearnsha@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).